Cited by 63Diabetes Management and ResearchMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and Education

Improved A1C Levels in Type 1 Diabetes with Smartphone App Use

Ryan, Edmond A., Holland, Joanna, Stroulia, Eleni, Bazelli, Blerina, Babwik, Stephanie A., Li, Haipeng, Senior, Peter, Greiner, Russ·2017·Canadian Journal of Diabetes

Abstract

Objectives Smartphones are a potentially useful tool in diabetes care. We have developed an application (app) linked to a website, Intelligent Diabetes Management (IDM), which serves as both an insulin bolus calculator and an electronic diabetes diary. We have prospectively studied whether patients using this app improved control of their glucose levels.Methods Patients with type 1 diabetes were recruited. There was a 4-week observation period, midway during which we offered to review the participants' records. The app was then downloaded and participants' diabetes regimens entered on the synchronized IDM website. At 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks of the active phase, their records were reviewed online, and feedback was provided electronically. The primary endpoint was change in levels of glycated hemoglobin (A1C).Results Of the 31 patients recruited, 18 completed the study. These 18 made 572±98 entries per person on the IDM system over the course of the study (≈5.1/day). Their ages were 40.0±13.9 years, the durations of their diabetes were 27.3±14.9 years and 44% used insulin pumps. The median A1C level fell from 8.1% (7.5 to 9.0, IQ range) to 7.8% (6.9 to 8.3; p<0.001). During the observation period, glucose records were reviewed for 50% of the participants. In the active phase, review of the glucose diaries took less time on the IDM website than using personal glucose records in the observation period, median 6 minutes (5 to 7.5 IQ range) vs. 10 minutes (7.5 to 10.5 IQ range; p<0.05).Conclusions Our smartphone app enables online review of glucose records, requires less time for clinical staff and is associated with improved glucose control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.06.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 63

Authors
Ryan, E. A., Holland, J., Stroulia, E., Bazelli, B., Babwik, S. A., Li, H., Senior, P., & Greiner, R.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Ryan, Edmond A.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Diabetes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
33-40
ISSN
1499-2671 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2509661580
Cited by
63
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 2
FWCI
10.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alberta Innovates Centre for Machine Learning (AICML RES0001512)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC RES0020439)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, mobile application, HbA1c, glycemic control, diabetes self-management
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Biomarkers, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review