Gaps in Referral to Bariatric Surgery for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Seen in Endocrinology Clinics
Abstract
Objectives One-third of adults in Canada are overweight and 26.8% experience obesity. Bariatric surgery confers effective weight loss and reduces obesity-related complications, including type 2 diabetes, but remains an underutilized treatment. Our objective in this study was to determine whether a gap exists in bariatric program referrals for patients with type 2 diabetes seen in endocrinology clinics at an ambulatory tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Canada. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted of 843 consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes in endocrinology clinics between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, type 2 diabetes and body mass index (BMI)>35 kg/m 2. Exclusion criteria were recent active cancer, uncontrolled psychiatric disease or active substance use disorder within 6 months of the initial visit. Referrals to bariatric surgery were assessed within a 5-year follow-up period and compared with baseline referral rates from the Ontario Bariatric Network (OBN). An online survey of 48 endocrinologists in Toronto, Ontario, was also conducted to assess physician-level barriers to referral. Results The proportion of patients with class II obesity (BMI>35 kg/m 2) and type 2 diabetes meeting the eligibility criteria for bariatric referral was 4.6% (n=38). A documented discussion about bariatric surgery occurred with 7 (18.0%) of these eligible patients, and 1 patient (2.6%) was referred for surgery. Aside from surgical referrals, only 2.6% of eligible patients were referred to cognitive-behavioural therapy, 36.8% were initiated on obesity pharmacotherapy and 42.1% were referred to a dietitian. Baseline OBN data demonstrated that most surgical referrals (n=6,360) were from family physicians (65.0%) and only 8.8% were from a medical specialist. Eight percent of surveyed endocrinologists reported that they discussed bariatric surgery with at least half of their eligible patients. The most frequent barrier to discussing bariatric surgery during visits was time constraints. Physicians identified that simplifying the referral process and providing bariatric surgery handouts would be helpful interventions to improve referral rates. Conclusions Our gap analysis demonstrated a low bariatric surgery referral rate by tertiary care endocrinologists. Our study also identified a large gap in the appropriate treatment of obesity with poor utilization of behavioural, lifestyle and pharmacotherapy practices. As obesity and diabetes rates increase, better education, training and knowledge translation will be necessary to overcome weight bias and prioritize obesity management.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Specific examples of bias and difficulty include gaps in referral to bariatric or metabolic surgery, with only <1% of qualified surgical candidates being referred for such operations.
“Specific examples include gaps in referral to bariatric or metabolic surgery,66 with only <1% of qualified surgical candidates being referred for such operations,67”
From Definition and diagnostic criteria of clinical obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [66]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 7
- Authors
- Holmes, S., Sarma, S., Campbell, S., Azab, A., Qiang, J., & Mukerji, G.
- Affiliations
- University Health Network (CA)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Mukerji, Geetha
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Diabetes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-12
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 835-842.e1
- ISSN
- 1499-2671 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4283390598
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Diabetes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- bariatric surgery, type 2 diabetes, obesity, referral rates, endocrinology clinic, obesity pharmacotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, dietitian referral, weight bias, tertiary care
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Obesity, Ontario, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies, Bariatric Surgery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review