The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of wood in green building: a study of expert perspectives from the UK
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Cited by
A bibliometric review of green building research 2000–2016
Zhao, X., Zuo, J., Wu, G., & Huang, C. (2019) · Architectural Science Review · doi:10.1080/00038628.2018.1485548 · Cited by 339
Recent trends in hydrogels based on psyllium polysaccharide: a review
Thakur, V. K., & Thakur, M. K. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.066 · Cited by 271
The greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options for materials used in UK construction
Giesekam, J., Barrett, J., Taylor, P., & Owen, A. (2014) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.035 · Cited by 202
Multi-storey timber construction and bioeconomy—barriers and opportunities
Riala, M., & Ilola, L. (2014) · Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.926980 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, L., Toppinen, A., & Juslin, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 65
- Pages
- 350-361
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986715703
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of wood in green building: a study of expert perspectives from the UK. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.023
- The paper
- Wang, L., Toppinen, A., & Juslin, H. (2014). Use of wood in green building: a study of expert perspectives from the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.