The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A review on developments in dyeing cotton fabrics with reactive dyes for reducing effluent pollution
Open accessAbstract
Most cotton fabrics are dyed with reactive dyes because they produce a full range of bright fashion colours with a high degree of wash fastness. Application of these dyes, however, causes high and undesirable levels of dissolved solids and oxygen demand in the effluent. This is due to the use of considerable quantities of inorganic salt and alkali to ensure efficient utilisation and fixation of the reactive dyes. Dye that is unfixed on cotton also contributes to effluent pollution. There are two approaches to deal with the effluent problem: 1. alternative dyeing techniques and technology, 2. effluent treatment after dyeing. The effluent treatment requires additional capital investment and high treatment and maintenance costs. Therefore, the first approach is always preferable. There have been a number of options developed to overcome the polluted effluent problem of dyeing cotton fabric with reactive dyes. This paper reviews the options to improve sustainability of the dyeing process through development of reactive dyes, modification of dyeing machinery and processes, chemical modification of cotton fibre prior to dyeing, use of biodegradable organic compounds in dyebath formulation, and effluent treatment processes. The paper highlights the significance and limitations of these ways of improving sustainability in reactive dyeing, and proposes the areas for further improvements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review on classifications, recent synthesis and applications of textile dyes
Benkhaya, S., M' rabet, S., & El Harfi, A. (2020) · Inorganic Chemistry Communications · doi:10.1016/j.inoche.2020.107891 · Cited by 927
Fan, S., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Tang, J., Tang, J., & Li, X. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2016.12.019 · Cited by 699
Feasibility of industrial-scale treatment of dye wastewater via bio-adsorption technology
Li, W., Mu, B., & Yang, Y. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.002 · Cited by 574
Microplastic Fallout in Different Indoor Environments
Zhang, Q., Zhao, Y., Du, F., Cai, H., Wang, G., & Shi, H. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c00087 · Cited by 435
Textile dyeing industry: Environmental impacts and remediation
Khattab, T. A., Abdelrahman, M. S., & Rehan, M. (2020) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-019-07137-z · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Authors
- Khatri, A., Peerzada, M. H., Mohsin, M., & White, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 87
- Pages
- 50-57
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088016474
- Cited by
- 613
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on developments in dyeing cotton fabrics with reactive dyes for reducing effluent pollution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.017
- The paper
- Khatri, A., Peerzada, M. H., Mohsin, M., & White, M. (2015). A review on developments in dyeing cotton fabrics with reactive dyes for reducing effluent pollution. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.