Cited by 55Forest Biomass Utilization and ManagementAgricultural and Food SciencesSustainable Supply Chain Management

Sustainable logistics network for wood flow considering cascade utilisation

Taskhiri, Mohammad Sadegh, Garbs, Matthias, Geldermann, Jutta·2016·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.098

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transportation accounts for 89% of total logistics costs.

    “Taskhiri et al. (2016) find that transportation accounts for 89% of total logistics costs”
  • Logistics is a factor that limits the implementation of cascading practices due to the difficulty and economic expenses related to collection and transportation of waste wood.

    “In particular, Garcia and Hora (2017), Keegan et al. (2013) and Taskhiri et al. (2016) name logistics as a factor that limits the implementation of cascading practices due to the sheer difficulty and economic expenses related to the collection of waste wood and its transportation from a collection site to a recycling facility and then, to a distribution network.”
  • A lack of specific incentives to promote and sustain the material use of wood is an important barrier.

    “In addition, a lack of specific incentives to promote and sustain the material use of wood is stated in the literature as an important barrier (e.g., Husgafvel et al., 2018;Taskhiri et al., 2016;Winder and Bobar, 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taskhiri, M. S., Garbs, M., & Geldermann, J.
Affiliations
University of Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Taskhiri, Mohammad Sadegh
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
110
Pages
25-39
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2179611125
Cited by
55
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
wood flow, recovered wood, wood waste, particleboard, pulp and paper production, wood pellets, CO2 emission reduction, life cycle assessment, mixed-integer linear programming, Lower Saxony

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review