CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 73

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Money, not morale: The impact of desires and beliefs on private investment in photovoltaic citizen participation initiatives

Fleiß, Eva, Hatzl, Stefanie, Seebauer, Sebastian, Posch, Alfred·2017·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.123
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.123

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. APA (Austrian Press Agency)
  2. Balcombe, 2014, Investigating the importance of motivations and barriers related to microgeneration uptake in the UK, Appl. Energy, 130, 403, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.05.047 · DOI
  3. Bauwens, 2015, What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 13, 136, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.016 · DOI
  4. Best, 2008, Die Umstellung auf ökologische Landwirtschaft. Empirische Analysen zur Low-Cost-Hypothese des Umweltverhaltens. Kolner Z, Soz. Sozpsychol., 60, 314
  5. Brudermann, 2013, Photovoltaics in agriculture: a case study on decision making of farmers, Energy Policy, 61, 96, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.081 · DOI
  6. Davidov, 2002, Time and Money: an Empirical Explanation of Behaviour in the Context of Travel-mode Choice with the German Microcensus, Eur. Sociol. Rev., vol. 19, 267, 10.1093/esr/19.3.267 · DOI
  7. Diekmann, 2003, Green and greenback: the behavioural effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations, Ration. Soc., 15, 441, 10.1177/1043463103154002 · DOI
  8. Dóci, 2015, Exploring the transition potential of renewable energy communities, Futures, 66, 85, 10.1016/j.futures.2015.01.002 · DOI
  9. Echegaray, 2014, Understanding stakeholders' views and support for solar energy in Brazil, J. Clean. Prod., 63, 125, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.017 · DOI
  10. EU, 2009, Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources, Off. J. Eur. Union
  11. Escribano Francés, 2013, RES and risk: renewable energy's contribution to energy security. A portfolio-based approach, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 26, 549, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.015 · DOI
  12. Grossmann, 2013, Distributed solar electricity generation across large geographic areas, Part I: a method to optimize site selection, generation, and storage. Renew. Sustain, Energy Rev., 25, 831
  13. Hargreaves, 2013, Grassroots innovations in community energy: the role of intermediaries in niche development, Glob. Environ. Chang., 23, 868, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.008 · DOI
  14. Hatzl, 2016, Market-based vs. grassroots citizen participation initiatives in photovoltaics: a qualitative comparison of niche development, Futures, 78–79, 57, 10.1016/j.futures.2016.03.022 · DOI
  15. Huijben, 2013, Breakthrough without subsidies? PV business model experiments in The Netherlands, Energy Policy, 56, 362, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.073 · DOI
  16. Islam, 2013, The impact of attribute preferences on adoption timing: the case of photo-voltaic (PV) solar cells for household electricity generation, Energy Policy, 55, 521, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.041 · DOI
  17. Jager, 2006, Simulating the diffusion of photovoltaic systems: a behavioural perspective, Energy Policy, 34, 1935, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.12.022 · DOI
  18. Keirstead, 2007, Behavioural responses to photovoltaic systems in the UK domestic sector, Energy Policy, 35, 4128, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.019 · DOI
  19. Klein, 2016, Building a sustainable energy future, one community at a time, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 60, 867, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.129 · DOI
  20. Madlener, 2007, Innovation diffusion, public policy, and local initiative: the case of wood-fuelled district heating systems in Austria, Energy Policy, 35, 1992, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.06.010 · DOI
  21. Maruyama, 2007, The rise of community wind power in Japan: enhanced acceptance through social innovation, Energy Policy, 35, 2761, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.010 · DOI
  22. Mautz, 2007, The expansion of renewable energies in Germany between niche dynamics and system integration – opportunities and restraints, Sci. Technol. Innov. Stud., 3, 113
  23. Oteman, 2014, The institutional space of community initiatives for renewable energy: a comparative case study of The Netherlands, Germany and Denmark, Energy. sustain. Soc., 4
  24. Parkhill, 2015, ’We are community [but] that takes a certain amount of energy’: exploring shared visions, social action, and resilience in place-based community-led energy initiatives, Environ. Sci. Policy, 53, 60, 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.014 · DOI
  25. Reinsberger, 2014, Bottom-up initiatives for photovoltaic: incentives and barriers, J. Sustain. Dev. Energy, Water Environ. Syst., 2, 108, 10.13044/j.sdewes.2014.02.0010 · DOI
  26. Schreuer, 2010, Energy cooperatives and local ownership in the field of renewable energy technologies: a literature review
  27. Seyfang, 2014, A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK, Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans., 13, 21, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.004 · DOI
  28. Seyfang, 2013, A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK, Energy Policy, 61, 977, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.030 · DOI
  29. Vasileiadou, 2016, Three is a crowd? Exploring the potential of crowdfunding for renewable energy in The Netherlands, J. Clean. Prod., 128, 142, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.028 · DOI
  30. Vasseur, 2015, The adoption of PV in The Netherlands: a statistical analysis of adoption factors, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 41, 483, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.020 · DOI
  31. Wirth, 2014, Communities matter: institutional preconditions for community renewable energy, Energy Policy, 70, 236, 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.021 · DOI
  32. Yildiz, 2014, Financing renewable energy infrastructures via financial citizen participation – the case of Germany, Renew. Energy, 68, 677, 10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.038 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fleiß, E., Hatzl, S., Seebauer, S., & Posch, A.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
141
Pages
920-927
ISSN
0959-6526
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.123
Cited by
73
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
Austrian Climate and Energy (KR12AC5K01278)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review