The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review
Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009 · Cited by 2,184
TZENG, G., CHIANG, C., & LI, C. (2007) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.004 · Cited by 1,266
Food Supply Chain Approaches: Exploring their Role in Rural Development
Marsden, T., Banks, J., & Bristow, G. (2000) · Sociologia Ruralis · doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00158 · Cited by 1,210
Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046 · Cited by 1,183
Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Jafarian, A. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014 · Cited by 1,040
The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy
Brauers, W. K., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2006) · Control and Cybernetics · Cited by 968
Self-citationAn inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China: Drivers and practices
Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2006) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.01.003 · Cited by 914
An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains
Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K., & Garg, C. P. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.078 · Cited by 838
A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry
Lee, A. H. I., Kang, H.-Y., Hsu, C.-F., & Hung, H.-C. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.052 · Cited by 800
Consumer Food Handling in the Home: A Review of Food Safety Studies
Redmond, E. C., & Griffith, C. J. (2003) · Journal of Food Protection · doi:10.4315/0362-028x-66.1.130 · Cited by 782
Cited by
A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems
Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., & Turskis, Z. (2019) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-05-2017-0458 · Cited by 1,117
Self-citationIntuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS method for green supplier selection problem
Rouyendegh, B. D., Yildizbasi, A., & Üstünyer, P. (2020) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-019-04054-8 · Cited by 258
Sustainable Supplier Evaluation: From Current Criteria to Reconstruction Based on ESG Requirements
Lou, S., You, X., & Xu, T. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16020757 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Hashemkhani Zolfani, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 142
- Pages
- 3728-3740
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2537158668
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 47.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.095
- The paper
- Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Hashemkhani Zolfani, S. (2017). Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.095
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
