The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pro-environmental behaviour in the workplace and the role of managers and organisation
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
McEachan, R. R. C., Conner, M., Taylor, N. J., & Lawton, R. J. (2011) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2010.521684 · Cited by 2,279
Cited by
Proposed managerial competencies for Industry 4.0 – Implications for social sustainability
Shet, S. V., & Pereira, V. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121080 · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- Wesselink, R., Blok, V., & Ringersma, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 168
- Pages
- 1679-1687
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2751149575
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 24.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
