CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 89

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developing criteria for performance assessment in municipal solid waste management

Rodrigues, A.P., Fernandes, M.L., Rodrigues, M.F.F., Bortoluzzi, S.C., Gouvea da Costa, S.E., Pinheiro de Lima, E.·2018·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.067
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.067

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. Ahen, 2015, What is the biggest question in CSR research?, Foresight, 17, 274, 10.1108/FS-05-2013-0020 · DOI
  2. AK, 2015, Sustainable municipal solid waste management decision making: development and implementation of a single score sustainability index, Manag. Environ. Qual. An Int. J., 26, 909, 10.1108/MEQ-03-2015-0028 · DOI
  3. Bana, 2001, The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to support the search for less conflicting policy options in a multi-actor context: case study, J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Analysis, 10, 111, 10.1002/mcda.292 · DOI
  4. Bana, 1999, Decision Support Systems in action: integrated application in a multicriteria decision aid process, Eur. J. Operational Res., 113, 315, 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00219-7 · DOI
  5. Bana, 2013, O método Macbeth e aplicação no Brasil, Engevista, 15, 3, 10.22409/engevista.v15i1.484 · DOI
  6. Bernardo, 2017, Using action research to implement selective waste collection program in a Brazilian city, Syst. Pract. Action Res., 30, 593, 10.1007/s11213-017-9416-9 · DOI
  7. Bhander, 2010, EASEWASTE-life cycle modeling capabilities for waste management technologies, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 15, 403, 10.1007/s11367-010-0156-7 · DOI
  8. Boland, 2000, A systems perspective of performance management in public sector organisations, Int. J. Public Sect. Manag., 13, 417, 10.1108/09513550010350832 · DOI
  9. Campos, 2014, Recycling in Brazil: challenges and prospects, Resour. Conservation Recycl., 85, 130, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.10.017 · DOI
  10. Carpes, 2006, Avaliação do desempenho das práticas de responsabilidade social na gestão organizacional por meio da metodologia MCDA Construtivista: uma abordagem aos modelos já existentes, Rev. Alcance, 13, 91
  11. Chen, 2014, Sustainability assessment of solid waste management in China: a decoupling and decomposition analysis, Sustainability, 6, 9268, 10.3390/su6129268 · DOI
  12. Corbett, 2009, Sustainable operations management: a typological approach, J. Industrial Eng. Manag., 2, 10
  13. Del Borghi, 2009, A survey of life cycle approaches in waste management, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 10.1007/s11367-009-0111-7 · DOI
  14. Den Boer, 2007, LCA-IWM: a decision support tool for sustainability assessment of waste management systems, Waste Manag., 27, 1032, 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.022 · DOI
  15. Deslatte, 2017, Urban pressures and innovations: sustainability commitment in the face of fragmentation and inequality, Rev. Policy Res., 34, 700, 10.1111/ropr.12242 · DOI
  16. Dutra, 2013, Estudo de caso: Proposta de modelo multicritério de avaliação de desempenho: um estudo de caso na secretaria municipal de indústria e comércio de Tubarão/SC, Revista Interdisciplinar Científica Aplicada, 7, 15
  17. Dutra, 2015, The construction of knowledge from the scientific literature about the theme seaport performance evaluation, Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag., 64, 243, 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2014-0015 · DOI
  18. Ensslin, 2001, Apoio à Decisão: metodologias para Estruturação de Problemas e Avaliação Multicritério de Alternativas, Ed. Insul.
  19. Ensslin, 2008, Uma metodologia multicritério (MCDA-C) para apoiar o gerenciamento do capital intelectual organizacional, RAM - Rev. Adm. Mackenzie, 9, 136, 10.1590/S1678-69712008000700007 · DOI
  20. Ensslin, 2010, Avaliação do desempenho de empresas terceirizadas com o uso da metodologia multicritério de apoio à decisão-construtivista, Pesqui. Oper., 30, 125, 10.1590/S0101-74382010000100007 · DOI
  21. Ensslin, 2013, Processo de investigação e análise bibliométrica: avaliação da qualidade dos serviços bancários, Rev. Adm. Contemp., 17, 325, 10.1590/S1415-65552013000300005 · DOI
  22. Ensslin, 2013, Modelo multicritério de apoio á decisão construtivista no processo de avaliação de fornecedores, Produção, 2, 402
  23. Ensslin, 2017, BPM governance: a literature analysis of performance evaluation, Bus. Process Manag. J., 23, 71, 10.1108/BPMJ-11-2015-0159 · DOI
  24. Fanning, 2016, Contrasting values in the sustainability debate: limitations of economic valuations and their role in decision-making, Int. J. Sustain. Dev., 19, 185, 10.1504/IJSD.2016.077205 · DOI
  25. Federico, 2009, In itinere strategic environmental assessment of an integrated provincial waste system, Waste Manag. Res. J. Int. Solid Wastes Public Clean. Assoc. ISWA, 27, 390, 10.1177/0734242X09103821 · DOI
  26. Ferreira, 2017, Maturity levels of material cycles and waste management in a context of green supply chain management: an innovative framework and its application to Brazilian cases, J. Material Cycles Waste Manag., 19, 516, 10.1007/s10163-015-0416-5 · DOI
  27. Ferrer, 2008, Sustainability : what does it mean for the operations Manager ?, J. Operations Supply Chain Manag., 1, 1, 10.12660/joscmv1n2p1-16 · DOI
  28. Gheewala, 2009, LCA of waste management systems-research opportunities, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 14, 589, 10.1007/s11367-009-0128-y · DOI
  29. Gnan, 2013, Corporate governance and management practices: stakeholder involvement, quality and sustainability tools adoption, J. Manag. Gov., 17, 907, 10.1007/s10997-011-9201-6 · DOI
  30. Guimarães, 2010, Does performance evaluation help public managers? A Balanced Scorecard approach in urban waste services, J. Environ. Manag., 91, 2632
  31. Gui-Zhen, 2007, Multi-indicator assessment of water environment in government environmental auditing, J. Environ. Sci., 19, 494, 10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60083-7 · DOI
  32. Gunasekaran, 2012, Sustainability of manufacturing and services: investigations for research and applications, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 140, 35, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.011 · DOI
  33. Hazlett, 2012, The role of operations management in public sector policy and practice alignment: a local government analysis, Prod. Plan. {&} Control, 7287, 1
  34. Homsy, 2015, Cities and sustainability: polycentric action and multilevel governance, Urban Affairs Review, 51, 46, 10.1177/1078087414530545 · DOI
  35. Kleindorfer, 2005, Sustainable operations management, Production and Operations Management, 14, 482, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00235.x · DOI
  36. Lacerda, 2012, Uma análise bibliométrica da literatura sobre estratégia e avaliação de desempenho, Gestão & Produção, 19, 59, 10.1590/S0104-530X2012000100005 · DOI
  37. Lacerda, 2014, Research opportunities in strategic management field: a performance measurement approach, International Journal of Business Performance Management, 15, 158, 10.1504/IJBPM.2014.060165 · DOI
  38. Larran, 2014, A proposal for measuring sustainability in universities: a case study of Spain, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1
  39. Li, 2015, Developing a sustainability assessment model to analyze China’s municipal solid waste management enhancement strategy, Sustainability, 7, 1116, 10.3390/su7021116 · DOI
  40. Longaray, 2015, Assessment of a Brazilian public hospital’s performance for management purposes: a soft operations research case in action, Operations Research for Health Care, 5, 28, 10.1016/j.orhc.2015.05.001 · DOI
  41. Longaray, 2016, Modelo multicritério de apoio à decisão construtivista para avaliação de desempenho do trade marketing : um caso ilustrado no setor farmacêutico mcda-c, Produção Online, 16, 49, 10.14488/1676-1901.v16i1.1885 · DOI
  42. Lozano, 2006, Incorporation and institutionalization of SD into universities: breaking through barriers to change, Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 787, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.12.010 · DOI
  43. Lundberg, 2009, Framework for environmental performance measurement in a Swedish public sector organization, Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 1017, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.01.011 · DOI
  44. Machado, 2017, Framing maturity based on sustainable operations management principles, International Journal of Production Economics, 190, 3, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.01.020 · DOI
  45. Marttunen, 2017, Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: a literature review of method combinations, European Journal of Operational Research, 263, 1, 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.041 · DOI
  46. Mendes, 2012, The balanced scorecard as an integrated model applied to the Portuguese public service: a case study in the waste sector, Journal of Cleaner Production, 24, 20, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.007 · DOI
  47. Mendes, 2013, Evaluating municipal solid waste management performance in regions with strong seasonal variability, Ecological Indicators, 30, 170, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.02.017 · DOI
  48. Milutinović, 2016, Sustainability assessment and comparison of waste management systems: the Cities of Sofia and Niš case studies, Waste Management & Research, 34, 896, 10.1177/0734242X16654755 · DOI
  49. Molin, 2013, Proposta de modelo multicritério de avaliação de desempenho : um estudo de caso na secretaria municipal de indústria e comércio de tubarão/sc, Revista Interdisciplinar Científica Aplicada
  50. Moraes, 2010, The multicriteria analysis for construction of benchmarkers to support the Clinical Engineering in the Healthcare Technology Management, European Journal of Operational Research, 200, 607, 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.018 · DOI
  51. Nouri, 2018, Industrial solid waste management through the application of multi-criteria decision-making analysis: a case study of Shamsabad industrial complexes, Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 20, 43, 10.1007/s10163-016-0544-6 · DOI
  52. Peltola, 2016, Value capture in business ecosystems for municipal solid waste management: comparison between two local environments, Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1270, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.168 · DOI
  53. Ramos, 2007, Environmental performance policy indicators for the public sector: the case of the defence sector, Journal of Environmental Management, 82, 410, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.12.020 · DOI
  54. Riddell, 2009, Assessing carbon dioxide emissions from energy use at a university, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10, 266, 10.1108/14676370910972576 · DOI
  55. Rodrigues, 2017, Avaliação de desempenho das operações sustentáveis na gestão municipal de resíduos : análise das ferramentas e indicadores propostos da literatura, XXXVII Encontro nacional de engenharia de producao
  56. Silva da Rosa, 2012, Environmental disclosure management: a constructivist case, Management Decision, 50, 1117, 10.1108/00251741211238364 · DOI
  57. Ryan-Fogarty, 2015, Greening healthcare: systematic implementation of environmental programmes in a university teaching hospital, Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, 248, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.079 · DOI
  58. Santos, 2017, Multi-criteria analysis for municipal solid waste management in a Brazilian metropolitan area, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189, 561, 10.1007/s10661-017-6283-x · DOI
  59. Shekdar, 2009, Sustainable solid waste management: an integrated approach for Asian countries, Waste Management, 29, 1438, 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.08.025 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Simpson, 2010, The economics of the informal sector in solid waste management, Vol. 5
  61. Sukholthaman, 2017, Analysis of waste generation variables and people’s attitudes towards waste management system: a case of Bangkok, Thailand, Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 19, 645, 10.1007/s10163-015-0456-x · DOI
  62. Usapein, 2015, Evaluating the performance of 3R options to reduce landfill wastes using the 3R indicator (3RI): case study of polyethylene factories in Thailand, Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 17, 303, 10.1007/s10163-014-0336-9 · DOI
  63. Veleva, 2001, Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology, Journal of Cleaner Production, 9, 519, 10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00010-5 · DOI
  64. Vicente, 2007, Segmenting households according to recycling attitudes in a Portuguese urban area, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52, 1, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.01.005 · DOI
  65. Wilson, 2015, ‘Wasteaware’ benchmark indicators for integrated sustainable waste management in cities, Waste Management, 35, 329, 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.006 · DOI
  66. Zaman, 2014, Measuring waste management performance using the ‘Zero Waste Index’: the case of Adelaide, Australia, Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 407, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.032 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rodrigues, A. P., Fernandes, M. L., Rodrigues, M. F. F., Bortoluzzi, S. C., Gouvea da Costa, S. E., & Pinheiro de Lima, E.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
186
Pages
748-757
ISSN
0959-6526
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.067
Cited by
89
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review