Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The design and development of domestic smart grid interventions: Insights from the Netherlands

Verkade, Nick, Höffken, Johanna·2018·Journal of Cleaner Production

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.185

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Ballo, 2015, Imagining energy futures: sociotechnical imaginaries of the future Smart Grid in Norway, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 9, 9, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.015 · DOI
  2. Berker, 2016, Planning story lines in smart grid road maps (2010–2014): three types of maps for coordinated time travel, J. Environ. Pol. Plann., 1
  3. Cuppen, 2018, The value of social conflicts. Critiquing invited participation in energy projects, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 38, 28, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.016 · DOI
  4. Dóci, 2015, Exploring the transition potential of renewable energy communities, Futures, 66, 85, 10.1016/j.futures.2015.01.002 · DOI
  5. Gangale, 2013, Consumer engagement: an insight from smart grid projects in Europe, Energy Pol., 60, 621, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.031 · DOI
  6. Geelen, 2013, Empowering the end-user in smart grids: recommendations for the design of products and services, Energy Pol., 61, 151, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.107 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Giordano, 2012, A business case for Smart Grid technologies: a systemic perspective, Energy Pol., 40, 252
  8. Giordano, 2011, Smart grid projects in Europe, JRC Ref. Rep. Sy., 8
  9. Hargreaves, 2017, Beyond energy feedback, Build. Res. Inf., 1
  10. Heiskanen, 2013, Learning about and involving users in energy saving on the local level, J. Clean. Prod., 48, 241, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.019 · DOI
  11. Matschoss, 2017, Making it experimental in several ways: the work of intermediaries in raising the ambition level in local climate initiatives, J. Clean. Prod., 169, 85, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.037 · DOI
  12. Nyborg, 2013, Constructing users in the smart grid—insights from the Danish eFlex project, Energy Effic., 6, 655, 10.1007/s12053-013-9210-1 · DOI
  13. Schick, 2015, Flexible and inflexible energy engagements—a study of the Danish Smart Grid Strategy, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 9, 51, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.013 · DOI
  14. Schick, 2013, Innovating Relations-or why smart grid is not too complex for the public, Sci. Technol. Stud., 26, 82, 10.23987/sts.55289 · DOI
  15. Sengers, 2016, Experimenting for sustainability transitions: a systematic literature review, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
  16. Skjølsvold, 2015, Ambivalence, designing users and user imaginaries in the European smart grid: insights from an interdisciplinary demonstration project, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 9, 43, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.026 · DOI
  17. Throndsen, 2016, What do experts talk about when they talk about users? Expectations and imagined users in the smart grid, Energy Effic., 2, 283
  18. Tolkamp, 2018, User-centred sustainable business model design: the case of energy efficiency services in The Netherlands, J. Clean. Prod., 182, 755, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.032 · DOI
  19. Tricoire, 2015, Uncertainty, vision, and the vitality of the emerging smart grid, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 9, 21, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.028 · DOI
  20. Verbong, 2007, The ongoing energy transition: lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004), Energy Pol., 35, 1025, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.02.010 · DOI
  21. Verbong, 2013, Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy, Energy Pol., 52, 117, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.003 · DOI
  22. Verkade, 2017, Is the Resource Man coming home? Engaging with an energy monitoring platform to foster flexible energy consumption in The Netherlands, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 27, 36, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.015 · DOI
  23. Vesnic-Alujevic, 2016, What smart grids tell about innovation narratives in the European Union: hopes, imaginaries and policy, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 12, 16, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.011 · DOI
  24. Wade, 2018, Managing professional jurisdiction and domestic energy use, Build. Res. Inf., 46, 42, 10.1080/09613218.2017.1324698 · DOI
  25. Wittmayer, 2017, Actor roles in transition: insights from sociological perspectives, Environ. Innovat. Soc. Transit., 24, 45, 10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003 · DOI
  26. Woolgar, 1990, Configuring the user: the case of usability trials, Socio. Rev., 38, 58, 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03349.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Verkade, N., & Höffken, J.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
202
Pages
799-805
ISSN
0959-6526
Cited by
24
References
0
Language
en
Funders
The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research NWO

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review