The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The design and development of domestic smart grid interventions: Insights from the Netherlands
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A similar approach has been conducted in other research on sociotechnical aspects of smart grid in novations [91,110].”
From Smart, circular and renewable: The role of cooperative governance in accelerating a sustainable energy transition (2025) · cites this paper as [110]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Ballo, 2015, Imagining energy futures: sociotechnical imaginaries of the future Smart Grid in Norway, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 9, 9, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.015 · DOI
- Berker, 2016, Planning story lines in smart grid road maps (2010–2014): three types of maps for coordinated time travel, J. Environ. Pol. Plann., 1
- Cuppen, 2018, The value of social conflicts. Critiquing invited participation in energy projects, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 38, 28, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.016 · DOI
- Dóci, 2015, Exploring the transition potential of renewable energy communities, Futures, 66, 85, 10.1016/j.futures.2015.01.002 · DOI
- Gangale, 2013, Consumer engagement: an insight from smart grid projects in Europe, Energy Pol., 60, 621, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.031 · DOI
- Geelen, 2013, Empowering the end-user in smart grids: recommendations for the design of products and services, Energy Pol., 61, 151, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.107 · DOI · Paper page
- Giordano, 2012, A business case for Smart Grid technologies: a systemic perspective, Energy Pol., 40, 252
- Giordano, 2011, Smart grid projects in Europe, JRC Ref. Rep. Sy., 8
- Hargreaves, 2017, Beyond energy feedback, Build. Res. Inf., 1
- Heiskanen, 2013, Learning about and involving users in energy saving on the local level, J. Clean. Prod., 48, 241, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.019 · DOI
- Matschoss, 2017, Making it experimental in several ways: the work of intermediaries in raising the ambition level in local climate initiatives, J. Clean. Prod., 169, 85, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.037 · DOI
- Nyborg, 2013, Constructing users in the smart grid—insights from the Danish eFlex project, Energy Effic., 6, 655, 10.1007/s12053-013-9210-1 · DOI
- Schick, 2015, Flexible and inflexible energy engagements—a study of the Danish Smart Grid Strategy, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 9, 51, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.013 · DOI
- Schick, 2013, Innovating Relations-or why smart grid is not too complex for the public, Sci. Technol. Stud., 26, 82, 10.23987/sts.55289 · DOI
- Sengers, 2016, Experimenting for sustainability transitions: a systematic literature review, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
- Skjølsvold, 2015, Ambivalence, designing users and user imaginaries in the European smart grid: insights from an interdisciplinary demonstration project, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 9, 43, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.026 · DOI
- Throndsen, 2016, What do experts talk about when they talk about users? Expectations and imagined users in the smart grid, Energy Effic., 2, 283
- Tolkamp, 2018, User-centred sustainable business model design: the case of energy efficiency services in The Netherlands, J. Clean. Prod., 182, 755, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.032 · DOI
- Tricoire, 2015, Uncertainty, vision, and the vitality of the emerging smart grid, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 9, 21, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.028 · DOI
- Verbong, 2007, The ongoing energy transition: lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004), Energy Pol., 35, 1025, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.02.010 · DOI
- Verbong, 2013, Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy, Energy Pol., 52, 117, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.003 · DOI
- Verkade, 2017, Is the Resource Man coming home? Engaging with an energy monitoring platform to foster flexible energy consumption in The Netherlands, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 27, 36, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.015 · DOI
- Vesnic-Alujevic, 2016, What smart grids tell about innovation narratives in the European Union: hopes, imaginaries and policy, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 12, 16, 10.1016/j.erss.2015.11.011 · DOI
- Wade, 2018, Managing professional jurisdiction and domestic energy use, Build. Res. Inf., 46, 42, 10.1080/09613218.2017.1324698 · DOI
- Wittmayer, 2017, Actor roles in transition: insights from sociological perspectives, Environ. Innovat. Soc. Transit., 24, 45, 10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003 · DOI
- Woolgar, 1990, Configuring the user: the case of usability trials, Socio. Rev., 38, 58, 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03349.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Van Opstal, W., Bocken, N., & Brusselaers, J. (2025) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104049 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Verkade, N., & Höffken, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 202
- Pages
- 799-805
- ISSN
- 0959-6526
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research NWO
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review