The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modeling and solving a sustainable closed loop supply chain problem with pricing decisions and discounts on returned products
Abstract
Abstract Increasing rates of environmental and social concerns involved in various communities have recently attracted researchers' attention to consider them in proper designs of sustainable supply chains (SSCs). In this paper, the planning problem of a multi-period multi-echelon sustainable closed loop supply chain (SCLSC) is investigated. A comprehensive model that seriously takes into account the social and environmental aspects of the supply chain (SC) decisions and measures their social and environmental effects using the GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) guideline indicators is proposed. The proposed planning model includes tactical decisions comprising the price of the product and logistic decisions. A discount offer is used on the returned product as an incentive policy to increase customers' willingness to return back the used products. In this offer, the discount depends on the quality of the returned products. Besides, as the discount for upcoming purchases stimulates customers to buy new products more, the product demand depends on the discount offer in addition to the product price. Moreover, two recovery approaches including remanufacturing and recycling alongside disposing of very low quality returned products are considered. Categorizing returned products according to their quality, quality-dependent recovery decisions for returned products, and the quality-dependent discount offer is the other novel points of this paper. The proposed model is implemented in a case study involving a CFL light bulbs supply chain. The TH (Torabi-Hassini) procedure is employed to solve the newly-developed three-objective optimization problem. The results of sensitivity analyses on the case-study demonstrate that the discount offer significantly improve the collecting rate of used products, which in turn helps improving sustainability. Finally, the Pareto optimal solutions show that the proposed approach provides a comprehensive planning model for SSCs which enables the decision makers to use a proper solution that considers legislation, social preference, cost, and environmental objectives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Govindan, K., Mina, H., Esmaeili, A., & Gholami-Zanjani, S. M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118317 · Cited by 331
Gunasekara, L., Robb, D. J., & Zhang, A. (2023) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108844 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Taleizadeh, A. A., Haghighi, F., & Niaki, S. T. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 207
- Pages
- 163-181
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2893629093
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling and solving a sustainable closed loop supply chain problem with pricing decisions and discounts on returned products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.198
- The paper
- Taleizadeh, A. A., Haghighi, F., & Niaki, S. T. A. (2019). Modeling and solving a sustainable closed loop supply chain problem with pricing decisions and discounts on returned products. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.