Cited by 170Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityWaste Management and RecyclingEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

Contextualising food waste prevention-Decisive moments within everyday practices

Open access
Hebrok, Marie, Heidenstrøm, Nina·2019·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.141

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 170

Authors
Hebrok, M., & Heidenstrøm, N.
Affiliations
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
Corresponding author
Hebrok, Marie
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
210
Pages
1435-1448
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2900494034
Cited by
170
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
14.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • CYCLE
  • Norwegian Research Council (2013–2017)
  • Norwegian Ministry of Children and Equality
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
household food waste, food waste prevention, consumer behavior, food storage practices, food procurement, food waste policy, everyday food practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review