Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Assessment of wind energy potential using wind energy conversion system

Shoaib, Muhammad, Siddiqui, Imran, Rehman, Shafiqur, Khan, Shamim, Alhems, Luai M.·2019·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract Wind energy, as a renewable resource, is the most rapidly growing source that produces electrical energy using wind turbines. Such a wind energy conversion system is both economical and is environmental friendly. It requires understanding of wind conditions at the site under study. With this intent, wind characteristics of Jhampir (district Thatta Sindh, Pakistan) are investigated and wind energy potential is determined. The study is conducted using 10-min averaged wind speed data obtained from Alternate Energy Development Board of Pakistan for a period of three years (2007–2010). Monthly, seasonal, and yearly analysis is performed by fitting measured wind speed data to a Weibull distribution function. Weibull shape and scale parameters are determined numerically using Maximum Likelihood Method, Modified Maximum Likelihood Method, and Energy Pattern Factor Methods. The suitability of the fit is assessed using goodness-of-fit tests, such as, Root Mean Square Error, Coefficient of Determination (R2), and Chi-Square (χ2) tests. In all three data analysis periods, RMSE values varied between 10−2 and 10−4. Similarly, R2 values varied between 0.989 and 0.996 and χ2-test between 10−4 and 10−8. For entire data set, all the tests showed better performance of Maximum Likelihood and Modified Maximum Likelihood Methods compared to Energy Pattern Factor. In case of monthly analysis, Maximum Likelihood Method performed better compared to Modified Maximum Likelihood Method and Energy Pattern Factor according to root mean square error and χ2 tests results. Seasonal performance of all the methods is found to be similar with marginal superiority of MLM over other methods. A very good agreement is observed between standard deviation values for measured wind speed data distribution and fitted Weibull distribution using Maximum Likelihood Method estimator. Additionally, to understand the optimum directional efficiency, directional wind power densities are calculated. Finally, a wind turbine is used to the seasonal and yearly wind speed data to determine the actual wind energy potential of the site. Extracted wind energy values for four seasons are found to be 1691, 2851, 4572, and 916 kWh with an annual yield of 10054 kWh. Wind energy values obtained for different periods and directions suggest that Jhampir is a suitable site for developing the wind power plant.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.128

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Shoaib, M., Siddiqui, I., Rehman, S., Khan, S., & Alhems, L. M.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
216
Pages
346-360
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913635339
Cited by
218
References
0
FWCI
21.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of wind energy potential using wind energy conversion system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.128
The paper
Shoaib, M., Siddiqui, I., Rehman, S., Khan, S., & Alhems, L. M. (2019). Assessment of wind energy potential using wind energy conversion system. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.128

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.