Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 350

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of hydrologically based environmental flow methods on flow alteration and energy production in a run-of-river hydropower plant

Kuriqi, Alban, Pinheiro, António N., Sordo-Ward, Alvaro, Garrote, Luis·2019·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract Increasing demand for renewable energy has led to a massive expansion of the small-scale hydropower plants and particularly those of run-of-river type. Meanwhile, the awareness concerning river conservation and restoration is being continually increasing. This study focuses on the assessment of environmental flows releases and energy production considering eight hydrological based environmental flows methods. The main goal of this study is to propose a practical approach that allows for quick estimation of the environmental flows releases and alteration due to water diversion for energy production, in the case of run-of-river hydropower plants. For this purpose, the indicators of hydrological alteration approach was applied to characterise flow alteration, and three economic metrics were used to assess the impact on energy production. Downstream Diversion Index was proposed to characterise the degree of water diversion due to energy production. Also, five new simplified indexes derived from indicators of hydrologic alteration approach were proposed to simplify flow alteration characterisation. The results of this study showed that a minor reduction of energy production could significantly improve environmental flows releases for the riverine ecosystem needs. Particularly, proportional dynamic approaches maximise energy production and imposes relatively less flow alteration. Also, it was concluded that following flow parameters: frequency, timing, duration and rates, can be maintained close to the natural regime without necessarily reducing the energy production by choosing the right environmental flows method. Finally, the methodology developed in this study can be a useful decision-making tool to help water managers, by including other relevant information also (i.e., biological, water supply, irrigation, and social) to choose the most appropriate method for the environmental flows determination in the case of run-of-river hydropower plants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.358

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 350

Metadata

Authors
Kuriqi, A., Pinheiro, A. N., Sordo-Ward, A., & Garrote, L.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
232
Pages
1028-1042
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947064583
Cited by
350
References
1
FWCI
41.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of hydrologically based environmental flow methods on flow alteration and energy production in a run-of-river hydropower plant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.358
The paper
Kuriqi, A., Pinheiro, A. N., Sordo-Ward, A., & Garrote, L. (2019). Influence of hydrologically based environmental flow methods on flow alteration and energy production in a run-of-river hydropower plant. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.358

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.