The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Willingness to pay a price premium for energy-saving appliances: Role of perceived value and energy efficiency labeling
Abstract
Abstract Energy consumption has caused major crises and severe global challenges, such as environmental problems and climate change. Household appliances are highly utilized products that consume considerable electricity. The wide adoption of energy-saving appliances saves power resources and promotes the development of low-carbon economy. However, energy-saving appliances are usually more expensive than ordinary household appliances, thereby hindering their widespread adoption. Therefore, the factors influencing consumers’ willingness to pay a price premium for energy-saving appliances should be explored. A comprehensive model was constructed based on the theory of planned behavior and consumer perceived value literature. The influencing factors were identified in terms of product, consumer, and regulation and publicity. Data were collected through questionnaire survey method, as it is suitable for collecting data on human beliefs and perceptions. 327 valid responses were obtained from the survey, and the data were analyzed using partial least squares. Results show that consumers’ attitude toward purchasing energy-saving appliances positively impacts willingness to pay a price premium. Consumer perceived quality, price, emotional, and environmental values significantly and positively impact consumers’ purchasing attitude. Furthermore, the perceived effectiveness of energy efficiency labeling institutional mechanism and personal norm significantly and positively influences consumers’ purchasing attitude. Nevertheless, social value, environmental awareness, and media publicity do not significantly affect consumers’ purchasing attitude. Finally, suggestions on how to promote energy-saving appliances were proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298805200302 · Cited by 18,292
The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009) · Advances in International Marketing · doi:10.1108/s1474-7979(2009)0000020014 · Cited by 10,926
Perceived Behavioral Control, Self‐Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior 1
Ajzen, I. (2002) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x · Cited by 7,629
Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale
Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(01)00041-0 · Cited by 6,643
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005 · Cited by 6,312
Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8 · Cited by 4,930
Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research
Straub, D., & Gefen, D. (2004) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.01324 · Cited by 2,797
Cited by
Lin, P.-H., & Chen, W.-H. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14148950 · Cited by 68
Examining the factors influencing fintech adoption behaviour of gen Y in India
Aggarwal, M., Nayak, K. M., & Bhatt, V. (2023) · Cogent Economics & Finance · doi:10.1080/23322039.2023.2197699 · Cited by 54
Wang, S., Ye, Y., Ning, B., Cheah, J.-H., & Lim, X.-J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.829696 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Xiao, C., & Zhou, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 242
- Pages
- 118555
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2975631143
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 29.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Willingness to pay a price premium for energy-saving appliances: Role of perceived value and energy efficiency labeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118555
- The paper
- Zhang, Y., Xiao, C., & Zhou, G. (2020). Willingness to pay a price premium for energy-saving appliances: Role of perceived value and energy efficiency labeling. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118555
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.