CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 444

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social factors influencing household waste separation: A literature review on good practices to improve the recycling performance of urban areas

Knickmeyer, Doris·2020·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118605
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118605

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig.1 The distribution of the selected publications per geographical region.
Fig.1 The distribution of the selected publications per geographical region.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Fig. 2 The distribution of the selected publications per year (1971-2018).
Fig. 2 The distribution of the selected publications per year (1971-2018).CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Ando, 2005, Recycling IN multifamily dwellings: does convenience matter?, Econ. Inq., 43, 426, 10.1093/ei/cbi029 · DOI
  2. Aparcana, 2017, Approaches to formalization of the informal waste sector into municipal solid waste management systems in low- and middle-income countries: review of barriers and success factors, Waste Manag., 61, 593, 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.028 · DOI
  3. Bandura, 1971, Social Learning Theory, General Learning Corporation, New York
  4. Barr, 2001, Differences between household waste reduction, reuse and recycling behaviour: a study of reported behaviours, intentions and explanatory variables, Environ. Waste Manag., 4, 69
  5. Berglund, 2006, The assessment of households’ recycling costs: the role of personal motives, Ecol. Econ., 56, 560, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.005 · DOI
  6. Bernstad, 2014, Household food waste separation behavior and the importance of convenience, Waste Manag., 34, 1317, 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.013 · DOI
  7. Bernstad, 2013, Door-stepping as a strategy for improved food waste recycling behaviour-Evaluation of a full-scale experiment, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 73, 94, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.12.012 · DOI
  8. Bozhikin, 2017, Environmental fiscal policy and other instruments for sustainable and efficient municipal solid waste management: a comparative study of Belgium and Bulgaria, Waste Manag., 65
  9. Bradford, 2018, Trash in America. Moving from destructive consumption to a zero-waste system, TexPIRG
  10. Burn, 1986, Increasing Community Recycling with Persuasive Communication and Public Commitment, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 16, 29, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb02276.x · DOI
  11. Dai, 2015, Why doorstepping can increase household waste recycling, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 102, 9, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.004 · DOI
  12. du Toit, 2017, Socio-spatial factors affecting household recycling in townhouses in Pretoria, South Africa, Sustainability, 9, 10.3390/su9112033 · DOI
  13. Duffy, 2009, It matters a hole lot, Environ. Behav., 41, 741, 10.1177/0013916508323737 · DOI
  14. Dupré, 2016, Increasing recycling through displaying feedback and social comparative feedback, J. Environ. Psychol., 48, 101, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.07.004 · DOI
  15. Ekere, 2009, Factors influencing waste separation and utilization among households in the Lake Victoria crescent, Uganda, Waste Manag., 29, 3047, 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.08.001 · DOI
  16. Garnett, 2014, Effective dialogue: enhanced public engagement as a legitimising tool for municipal waste management decision-making, Waste Manag., 34, 2709, 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.08.011 · DOI
  17. Guerin, 2001, A multilevel analysis of the determinants of recycling behavior in the european countries, Soc. Sci. Res., 30, 195, 10.1006/ssre.2000.0694 · DOI
  18. Hage, 2009, Norms and economic motivation in household recycling: empirical evidence from Sweden, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 53, 155, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.11.003 · DOI
  19. Iyer, 2007, Consumer recycling: role of incentives, information, and social class, J. Consum. Behav., 6, 32, 10.1002/cb.206 · DOI
  20. Jenkins, 2003, The determinants of household recycling: a material-specific analysis of recycling program features and unit pricing, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 45, 294, 10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00054-2 · DOI
  21. Klöckner, 2011, General vs. domain specific recycling behaviour - applying a multilevel comprehensive action determination model to recycling in Norwegian student homes, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 55, 463, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.12.009 · DOI
  22. Knussen, 2008, “I’m not in the habit of recycling”: the role of habitual behavior in the disposal of household waste, Environ. Behav., 40, 683, 10.1177/0013916507307527 · DOI
  23. Kurian, 2006, Stakeholder participation for sustainable waste management, Habitat Int., 30, 863, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2005.09.009 · DOI
  24. Li, 2017, Incentives for food waste diversion: exploration of a long term successful Chinese city residential scheme, J. Clean. Prod., 156, 491, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.198 · DOI
  25. Loan, 2017, Psychological driving forces behind households’ behaviors toward municipal organic waste separation at source in Vietnam: a structural equation modeling approach, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., 19, 1052, 10.1007/s10163-017-0587-3 · DOI
  26. Ma, 2016, Exploring social dimensions of municipal solid waste management around the globe – a systematic literature review, Waste Manag., 56, 3, 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.041 · DOI
  27. Ma, 2018, An analysis of influencing factors on municipal solid waste source-separated collection behavior in Guilin, China by Using the Theory of Planned Behavior, Sustain. Cities Soc., 37, 336, 10.1016/j.scs.2017.11.037 · DOI
  28. Martin, 2006, Social, cultural and structural influences on household waste recycling: a case study, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 48, 357, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.09.005 · DOI
  29. Matthies, 2012, The role of parental behaviour for the development of behaviour specific environmental norms - the example of recycling and re-use behaviour, J. Environ. Psychol., 32, 277, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.04.003 · DOI
  30. McKenzie-Mohr, 2002, New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior: Promoting Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing, J. Soc. Issues, 56, 543, 10.1111/0022-4537.00183 · DOI
  31. Meng, 2016, Multi-agent based simulation for household solid waste recycling behavior, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 128, 535, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.033 · DOI
  32. Miafodzyeva, 2013, Recycling behaviour among householders: synthesizing determinants via a meta-analysis, Waste and Biomass Valorization, 4, 221, 10.1007/s12649-012-9144-4 · DOI
  33. Miliute, 2009, Driving forces for high household waste recycling: lessons from Sweden, Environ. Res. Eng. Manag., 1, 50
  34. Nomura, 2011, The use of feedback to enhance environmental outcomes: A randomised controlled trial of a food waste scheme, Local Environment, 16, 637, 10.1080/13549839.2011.586026 · DOI
  35. Ølander, 2005, The A-B-C of recycling, Eur. Adv. Consum. Res., 7, 297
  36. Park, 2018, Factors influencing the recycling rate under the volume-based waste fee system in South Korea, Waste Manag., 74, 43, 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.008 · DOI
  37. Park, 2015, Analyzing the success of the volume-based waste fee system in South Korea, Waste Manag., 43, 533, 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.011 · DOI
  38. Puyuelo, 2013, Comparison of compostable bags and aerated bins with conventional storage systems to collect the organic fraction of municipal solid waste from homes. A Catalonia case study, Waste Manag., 33, 1381, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.02.015 · DOI
  39. Reichenbach, 2008, Status and prospects of pay-as-you-throw in Europe - a review of pilot research and implementation studies, Waste Manag., 28, 2809, 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.07.008 · DOI
  40. Schwab, 2014, The effects of emergent norms and attitudes on recycling behavior, Environ. Behav., 46, 403, 10.1177/0013916512466093 · DOI
  41. Schwartz, 1977, Normative influences on altruism, Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 10, 221, 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Shi, 2014, Multi-objective agent-based modeling of single-stream recycling programs, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 92, 190, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.002 · DOI
  43. Shrum, 1994, Recycling as a marketing problem: a framework for strategy development, Psychol. Mark., 11, 393, 10.1002/mar.4220110407 · DOI
  44. Thomas, 2001, Public understanding and its effects on recycling performance in Hampshire and Milton Keynes, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 32, 259, 10.1016/S0921-3449(01)00065-9 · DOI
  45. Thomas, 2013, Understanding the normalisation of recycling behaviour and its implications for other pro-environmental behaviours: a review of social norms and recycling, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 79, 11, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.010 · DOI
  46. Timlett, 2008, Public participation and recycling performance in England: a comparison of tools for behaviour change, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 52, 622, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.08.003 · DOI
  47. Timlett, 2009, The impact of transient populations on recycling behaviour in a densely populated urban environment, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 53, 498, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.010 · DOI
  48. Timlett, 2011, The ISB model (infrastructure, service, behaviour): a tool for waste practitioners, Waste Manag., 31, 1381, 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.12.010 · DOI
  49. Tonglet, 2004, Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: a case study from Brixworth, UK, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 41, 191, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2003.11.001 · DOI
  50. Tsaur, 2014, Analysis of the relationships among motivation to recycle, willingness to recycle, and satisfaction with recovery stations in Taiwan, WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev., 10, 26
  51. Varotto, 2017, Psychological strategies to promote household recycling . A systematic review with meta-analysis of validated fi eld interventions, J. Environ. Psychol., 51, 168, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.011 · DOI
  52. Vassanadumrongdee, 2018, Factors influencing source separation intention and willingness to pay for improving waste management in Bangkok, Thailand, Sustain. Environ. Res., 28, 90, 10.1016/j.serj.2017.11.003 · DOI
  53. Vicente, 2007, Segmenting households according to recycling attitudes in a Portuguese urban area, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 52, 1, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.01.005 · DOI
  54. Vicente, 2008, Factors influencing households’ participation in recycling, Waste Manag. Res., 26, 140, 10.1177/0734242X07077371 · DOI
  55. Wan, 2017, Experiential and instrumental attitudes: interaction effect of attitude and subjective norm on recycling intention, J. Environ. Psychol., 50, 69, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.02.006 · DOI
  56. Whishaw, 2006, Chapter 8 analysis of behavior in laboratory rats, 191
  57. WHO, 2017, Strategic communications framework for effective communications, World Heal. Organ., 3, 1
  58. Williams, 2004, Maximising household waste recycling at civic amenity sites in Lancashire, England, Waste Manag., 24, 861, 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.02.002 · DOI
  59. Woodard, 2000, The use of cash vouchers to incentivise householders to recycle, Proc. Waste 2006; Sustain. Waste Resour. Manag.
  60. Xu, 2016, Perceived key elements of a successful residential food waste sorting program in urban apartments: stakeholder views, J. Clean. Prod., 134, 362, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.107 · DOI
  61. Yau, 2012, Stakeholder engagement in waste recycling in a high-rise setting, Sustain. Dev., 20, 115, 10.1002/sd.468 · DOI
  62. Zaman, 2015, A comprehensive review of the development of zero waste management: lessons learned and guidelines, J. Clean. Prod., 91, 12, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.013 · DOI
  63. Zaman, 2011, Urban growth and waste management optimization towards “zero waste city.”, City, Cult. Soc., 2, 177, 10.1016/j.ccs.2011.11.007 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 444

Metadata

Authors
Knickmeyer, D.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
245
Pages
118605
ISSN
0959-6526
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118605
Cited by
444
References
5
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review