Cited by 69Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionInsect Utilization and EffectsComposting and Vermicomposting Techniques

Biogas generation from insects breeding post production wastes

Open access
Bulak, Piotr, Proc, Kinga, Pawłowska, Małgorzata, Kasprzycka, Agnieszka, Berus, Wojciech, Bieganowski, Andrzej·2020·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Insect breeding generates waste: insect excrements, often mixed with the remains of the feed. Insect waste is usually sold as a plant fertilizer, however, there is one more method of its use – methane production via the anaerobic digestion. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this topic is very poorly studied. The aim of this work was the evaluation of the suitability of the waste derived from insects breeding (Hermetia illucens, Tenebrio molitor and Gryllus spp.) for methane production. The mesophilic anaerobic digestion process was performed in 500 ml bioreactors. The temperature of the process was 37 °C ± 1 °C and initial pH was 7.0 ± 0.2. The substrate loading comprised 3.5 g of total solids and the inoculum-to-substrate ratio was 2:1. The biomethane potential of investigated wastes was ∼177 ml g−1 TS for H. illucens, ∼212 ml g−1 TS for Tenebrio molitor to ∼225 ml g−1 TS for Gryllus spp.. The obtained biomethane potentials are similar to more commonly used substrates for anaerobic digestion like: cattle manure, mink manure, poultry manure, fruit and vegetables waste, ryegrass, switchgrass, wheat, and sewage sludge, which points to the reasonability of their use. Anaerobic digestion can be a new method for valorization of insect post-production wastes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118777

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The biomethane potential of BSFL frass is similar to the substrate used in biogas plants.

    “They found that the obtained biomethane potential is similar to the substrate used in biogas plants, demonstrating the feasibility of this method to their utilization and producing a better-quality frass as a fertilizer.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bulak, P., Proc, K., Pawłowska, M., Kasprzycka, A., Berus, W., & Bieganowski, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
  • Lublin University of Technology (PL)
Corresponding author
Bulak, Piotr
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
244
Pages
118777
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980169508
Cited by
69
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Keywords
biogas production, anaerobic digestion, Hermetia illucens, Tenebrio molitor, Gryllus, biochemical methane potential, mesophilic digestion, waste valorization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review