Cited by 144Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityWaste Management and RecyclingAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Delivery, impact and approach of household food waste reduction campaigns

Zamri, Gesyeana Bazlyn, Azizal, Nur Khaiyum Abizal, Nakamura, Shohei, Okada, Koji, Nordin, Norul Hajar, Othman, NorÁzizi, MD Akhir, Fazrena Nadia, Sobian, Azrina +2 more·2020·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118969

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such studies cannot be simply extended to different religious settings and communities such as Islamic societies.

    “Such studies cannot be simply extended to different religious settings and communities such as Islamic societies [15,16].”
  • Studies on food waste have focused on environmental and economic-based approaches, while the religion-based approach has been relegated.

    “However, studies on food waste [15] reveal that they have been focused on environmental and economic-based approaches, while the religion-based approach has so far been relegated.”
  • Most earlier studies have inspected the impact of religiosity on customer's behaviors through Christian and Jewish believers and mainly in the Western context.

    “Additionally, most earlier studies have inspected the impact of religiosity on customer's behaviors through Christian and Jewish believers and mainly in the Western context [15].”
  • Previous studies highlighted the impact of environmental and economic-based approaches on food waste intention, while the religion-based approach and consumption culture have so far been relegated.

    “Previous studies highlighted the impact of the environmental and economic-based approaches on food waste intention, while the religion-based approach and the consumption culture has so far been relegated [15].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 144

Authors
Zamri, G. B., Azizal, N. K. A., Nakamura, S., Okada, K., Nordin, N. H., Othman, N., MD Akhir, F. N., Sobian, A., Kaida, N., & Hara, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
Corresponding author
Hara, Hirofumi
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
246
Pages
118969
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981961642
Cited by
144
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 7
FWCI
9.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • UTM Institutional Repository (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Japan International Cooperation Agency
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
household food waste, consumer behavior change, public awareness campaigns, environmental impact of food waste, developed and developing countries comparison, food waste education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review