Life cycle assessment of biochar produced from forest residues using portable systems
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Overall, biochar produced through the ACB system had higher carbon fixation compared to that of the BSI system.
“Overall, biochar produced through the ACB system had higher carbon fixation compared to that of the BSI system.”
From Lifecycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis of Biochar Pellet Production from Forest Residues and Field Application (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Roberts, K. G., Gloy, B. A., Joseph, S., Scott, N. R., & Lehmann, J. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es902266r · Cited by 1,243 · see citing works
Biomass Pyrolysis for Biochar or Energy Applications? A Life Cycle Assessment
Peters, J. F., Iribarren, D., & Dufour, J. (2015) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es5060786 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Badger, P., Badger, S., Puettmann, M., Steele, P., & Cooper, J. (2010) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.6.1.34-47 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Economics of Biomass Logistics and Conversion Facility Mobility: An Oregon Case Study
Berry, M. D., & Sessions, J. (2018) · Applied Engineering in Agriculture · doi:10.13031/aea.12383 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Wang, Z., Dunn, J.B., Han, J., Wang, M.Q., 2014. Effects of co-produced biochar on life cycle 682 greenhouse gas emissions of pyrolysis-derived renewable fuels. Biofuel Bioprod. Biorefining 8(2), 683
- Wright, M.M., Brown, R.C., Boateng, A.A., 2008. Distributed processing of biomass to bio-oil for 687 subsequent production of Fischer-Tropsch liquids. Biofuel Bioprod. Biorefining 2(3), 229-238. 688
- Zanchi, G., Pena, N., Bird, N., 2012. Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative 691 assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel. 4(6), 761-772. 692
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multifunctional applications of biochar beyond carbon storage
Bolan, N., Hoang, S. A., Beiyuan, J., Gupta, S., Hou, D., Karakoti, A., Joseph, S., Jung, S., Kim, K.-H., Kirkham, M. B., et al. (2022) · International Materials Reviews · doi:10.1080/09506608.2021.1922047 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Ghodake, G. S., Shinde, S. K., Kadam, A. A., Saratale, R. G., Saratale, G. D., Kumar, M., Palem, R. R., AL-Shwaiman, H. A., Elgorban, A. M., Syed, A., et al. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126645 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Awogbemi, O., Kallon, D. V. V., Onuh, E. I., & Aigbodion, V. S. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14185687 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Bergman, R., Sahoo, K., Englund, K., & Mousavi-Avval, S. H. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15041559 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“There were several scenarios studied that considered types of feedstocks, production systems, processing location, and sources of electricity used in operating the production systems [27].”
Self-citationSchipfer, F., Pfeiffer, A., & Hoefnagels, R. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15020433 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Puettmann, M., Sahoo, K., Wilson, K., & Oneil, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sahoo, Kamalakanta
- ORCID
- Sahoo, Kamalakanta
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 250
- Pages
- 119564
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2992606007
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (acceptedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
- Keywords
- biochar, forest residues, slash burning, fuel treatment, wildfire mitigation, global warming potential, biomass gasification, logging residues, feedstock preparation, cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
