The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What factors affect the synergy and tradeoff between ecosystem services, and how, from a geospatial perspective?
Abstract
Abstract Determining what factors affect the relationship between ecosystem services (benefits people derive from ecosystems) and how the impact distributed, is conducive to strengthening ecological governance and improving the sustainable development of the ecological environment. However, previous studies remained difficulties in directly regressing with potential impact factors after spatializing the relationship between ecosystem services (ESs) and neglected the impact of urbanization. Therefore, we asked the following: (i) Whether the relationship between ecosystem services is spatially heterogeneous? (ii) Whether the relationship between ecosystem services is only related to the natural environment or is also affected by urbanization? (iii) Are the correlations between such relationship and latent influencing factors consistent in space? In this study, we mapped the relationships between four ESs (grain productivity, carbon storage, outdoor recreation, and biodiversity conservation), and analyzed the spatial correlation between such relationships and ecological factors and urbanization factors, using geographically weighted logical regression (GWLR). The relationship between ESs is spatially heterogeneous, and a refined mechanism for the relationship between ESs was proposed in this study to explain it. The occurrence of the synergy and tradeoff between ESs is not only related to the natural environment but also affected by urbanization, that the relationships are robustly correlated to landform factor, meteorological factors, and urbanization factors; and the properties and intensity of the correlations varied with space. This study allows generalization, that the data, models, and software used in this study are universal in the field; the relevant factors selected in this study are also universal and meaningful in other study areas; research in other regions or larger scale regions can refer to the method and mechanism proposed in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools
Seto, K. C., Güneralp, B., & Hutyra, L. R. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211658109 · Cited by 5,086
Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain
Monteith, J. L. (1977) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1977.0140 · Cited by 3,484
The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China
Piao, S., Ciais, P., Huang, Y., Shen, Z., Peng, S., Li, J., Zhou, L., Liu, H., Ma, Y., Ding, Y., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09364 · Cited by 3,462
Terrestrial ecosystem production: A process model based on global satellite and surface data
Potter, C. S., Randerson, J. T., Field, C. B., Matson, P. A., Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., & Klooster, S. A. (1993) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/93gb02725 · Cited by 2,986
The Interpretation of Statistical Maps
Moran, P. A. P. (1948) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1948.tb00012.x · Cited by 2,882
Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services
Bennett, E. M., Peterson, G. D., & Gordon, L. J. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x · Cited by 2,481
Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes
Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G. D., & Bennett, E. M. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0907284107 · Cited by 2,016
Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns?
Ricketts, T. H., Regetz, J., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S. A., Kremen, C., Bogdanski, A., Gemmill‐Herren, B., Greenleaf, S. S., Klein, A. M., Mayfield, M. M., et al. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x · Cited by 1,379
Estoque, R. C., Murayama, Y., & Myint, S. W. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.195 · Cited by 1,244
Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities
Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Green, R. E., Lehner, B., Malcolm, T. R., & Ricketts, T. H. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0707823105 · Cited by 1,048
Cited by
Xia, H., Yuan, S., & Prishchepov, A. V. (2023) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106767 · Cited by 523
Shen, J., Li, S., Liu, L., Liang, Z., Wang, Y., Wang, H., & Wu, S. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125193 · Cited by 268
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 257
- Pages
- 120454
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3005393620
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What factors affect the synergy and tradeoff between ecosystem services, and how, from a geospatial perspective? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120454
- The paper
- Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020). What factors affect the synergy and tradeoff between ecosystem services, and how, from a geospatial perspective? Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120454
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.