Cited by 89Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchRecycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

Recycled gypsum powder from waste drywalls combined with fly ash for partial cement replacement in concrete

Open access
Hansen, Sarah, Sadeghian, Pedram·2020·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122785

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Hansen, S., & Sadeghian, P.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Sadeghian, Pedram
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
274
Pages
122785
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3043151026
Cited by
89
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (acceptedVersion)
  • DalSpace (Dalhousie University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
PA
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
Keywords
fly ash, partial cement replacement, supplementary cementitious materials, concrete compressive strength, waste recycling in construction, superplasticizer, carbon footprint reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review