Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 432

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The relationship between environmental, social, and financial performance in the banking sector: A European study

Bătae, Oana Marina, Dragomir, Voicu Dan, Feleagă, Liliana·2021·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract There is a growing interest in assessing environmental performance, social responsibility, and corporate governance (ESG) in the banking sector. Also, significant relationships are expected between ESG dimensions and corporate financial performance. The purpose of this research is to analyze the relationships between ten dimensions of the environmental, social, and governance pillars and bank financial performance, for the decade after the 2008 financial crisis. Data was collected from the Refinitiv database for 39 European banks, for the period 2010–2019. Our results show a positive relationship between emission reductions and financial performance. However, a bank’s accounting and market performance may be at odds with its product quality and social responsibility policies. Moreover, an increase in the quality of a bank’s corporate governance system was found to negatively affect company financial performance. Our results have multiple theoretical implications. The predictions related to stakeholder theory and the resource-based view were confirmed, as banks show interest in resource efficiency, environment-aware products and services, and process digitization. On the other hand, the prediction of stakeholder theory regarding the positive relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance was rejected. Also, corporate governance quality has a negative contribution to accounting performance and market valuation, going against the hypotheses of agency theory. This could mean that market investors do not value a bank’s involvement in social responsibility initiatives and do not endorse the adoption of best governance practices that could reduce the riskiness of a bank’s portfolio. These findings have practical implications for bank managers and company boards in selecting and disclosing ESG policies and initiatives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125791

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 118 references

Cited by

See all 432

Metadata

Authors
Bătae, O. M., Dragomir, V. D., & Feleagă, L.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
290
Pages
125791
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3119957147
Cited by
432
References
118
FWCI
58.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relationship between environmental, social, and financial performance in the banking sector: A European study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125791
The paper
Bătae, O. M., Dragomir, V. D., & Feleagă, L. (2021). The relationship between environmental, social, and financial performance in the banking sector: A European study. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125791

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.