Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are green bonds a different asset class? Evidence from time-frequency connectedness analysis

Open access
Ferrer, Román, Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain, Soriano, Pilar·2021·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract This paper investigates the time-frequency connectedness across the global green bond market and several mainstream financial and energy markets in an attempt to figure out whether green bonds represent a different asset class. The connectedness methodology proposed by Barunik and Křehlik (2018) is employed for that purpose. This approach enables quantifying the dynamics of connectedness in terms of return and volatility over time and across time scales simultaneously. The empirical results indicate that connectedness between the global green bond market and the conventional financial and energy markets mainly occurs at shorter time horizons, suggesting that shocks are rapidly transmitted across markets with an effect lasting less than a week. A strong connectedness in return and volatility is found between green bonds and Treasury and investment-grade corporate bonds, principally because of the numerous characteristics they share. This finding implies that green fixed-income securities are not a different asset class, but they closely mirror the performance of government and high-quality corporate bonds. In contrast, there is a quite limited connectedness between the green bond market and the general stock market, the renewable energy equity sector and the crude oil market regardless of the time horizon considered. This evidence shows that green bonds appear as a valuable tool to fight against climate change without having to sacrifice part of the return generated by traditional assets, particularly ordinary bonds. Furthermore, it can have useful implications for investors and policy makers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125988

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Metadata

Authors
Ferrer, R., Shahzad, S. J. H., & Soriano, P.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
292
Pages
125988
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121248168
Cited by
253
References
32
FWCI
33.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are green bonds a different asset class? Evidence from time-frequency connectedness analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125988
The paper
Ferrer, R., Shahzad, S. J. H., & Soriano, P. (2021). Are green bonds a different asset class? Evidence from time-frequency connectedness analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125988

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.