The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Industry 4.0, cleaner production and circular economy: An integrative framework for evaluating ethical and sustainable business performance of manufacturing organizations
Abstract
Abstract Organizations are increasingly facing pressure for changing manufacturing models from traditional to sustainable which accordingly reinforces the need for assessing their performance on sustainability issues. The present study developed a framework based on concepts of circular economy, sustainable cleaner production and Industry 4.0 standards to assess sustainability performance of manufacturing companies and to guide them in prioritizing investment in potential solutions for enhancing performance on sustainability. The study involved a mix of quantitative and qualitative research methods. An exhaustive review of related literature was conducted, followed by several rounds of discussions (Delphi Method) with experts, to identify and finalize practices related to Industry 4.0, cleaner production and circular economy. Best-Worst Method (BWM) was then used to prioritize identified practices. Majority of the sustainability frameworks in extant literature were validated using the case study approach. The present research combined case study approach with multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) tools, which enhanced applicability of the proposed framework. Findings suggest that circular economy practices are most important for increasing sustainability performance in manufacturing, followed by practices of cleaner production and Industry 4.0. ‘Supply Chain Traceability/Information’, ‘Reuse and recycling infrastructure’, and ‘Natural and clean environment’, were the top three practices identified for manufacturing organizations aiming to enhance sustainability. The findings provide empirical support for adopting practices of the circular economy, cleaner production and Industry 4.0 by manufacturing organizations to improve sustainability performance. The developed framework can be readily used by managers to evaluate their own as well as the upstream and/or downstream partners’ sustainability performance. It also provides policy guidance for promoting sustainability approaches in manufacturing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
Stahel, W. R. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/531435a · Cited by 2,555
Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gawankar, S. A. (2018) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009 · Cited by 1,440
Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Jabbour, C. J. C., Godinho Filho, M., & Roubaud, D. (2018) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8 · Cited by 1,116
Can big data and predictive analytics improve social and environmental sustainability?
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Luo, Z., Wamba, S. F., & Roubaud, D. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.020 · Cited by 860
Circular economy meets industry 4.0: Can big data drive industrial symbiosis?
Tseng, M.-L., Tan, R. R., Chiu, A. S. F., Chien, C.-F., & Kuo, T. C. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.028 · Cited by 499
Luthra, S., Kumar, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Mangla, S. K., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1660828 · Cited by 376
Self-citation
Cited by
Abulibdeh, A., Zaidan, E., & Abulibdeh, R. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140527 · Cited by 641
Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Grybauskas, A., Vilkas, M., & Petraitė, M. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2867 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, H., Kumar, A., & Wasan, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 295
- Pages
- 126253
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3126294703
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 59.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Industry 4.0, cleaner production and circular economy: An integrative framework for evaluating ethical and sustainable business performance of manufacturing organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126253
- The paper
- Gupta, H., Kumar, A., & Wasan, P. (2021). Industry 4.0, cleaner production and circular economy: An integrative framework for evaluating ethical and sustainable business performance of manufacturing organizations. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.