The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of energy consumption and carbon emissions from clinker and recycled cement production
Abstract
Abstract The cement industry is presently facing the demanding challenge of reducing its large amount of carbon emissions in order to meet the targets set to fight climate changes. One recent, and very promising, approach to reduce the carbon footprint is the production of more eco-efficient recycled cement from cement-based waste materials. This study aims at comparing the difference in terms of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions between recycled cement and conventional clinker production. In a conservative scenario, the estimated carbon dioxide emissions from recycling cement was as low as 58%–74% of the clinker production. From the sensibility analysis, it was found that the most influencing factors for the carbon emissions from the recycled cement production are: i) the waste cement water content; ii) the fraction of cement paste on waste material; and iii) the dryer energy intensity. The main drawback of the recycled cement production process is the pretreatment stage related with washing and drying of waste materials. The carbon dioxide emissions from recycled cement production can be potentially reduced to only 13% of the emissions from clinker production, if these pretreatment stages are avoided by developing a dry process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Akhtar, A., & Sarmah, A. K. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.085 · Cited by 1,250
An investigation on the recycling of hydrated cement from concrete demolition waste
Gastaldi, D., Canonico, F., Capelli, L., Buzzi, L., Boccaleri, E., & Irico, S. (2015) · Cement and Concrete Composites · doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.04.010 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Sousa, V., & Bogas, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 306
- Pages
- 127277
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3158079442
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of energy consumption and carbon emissions from clinker and recycled cement production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127277
- The paper
- Sousa, V., & Bogas, J. A. (2021). Comparison of energy consumption and carbon emissions from clinker and recycled cement production. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127277
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.