Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Household waste management in Shanghai and its implications for the second-tier cities in China

Li, Wenhua, Wang, Juntao·2021·Journal of Cleaner Production

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128980

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Aldaco, 2020, Science of the Total Environment. Food waste management during the COVID-19 outbreak: a holistic climate, economic and nutritional approach, Sci. Total Environ., 742, 140524, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140524 · DOI
  2. Azevedo, 2021, Improving urban household solid waste management in developing countries based on the German experience, Waste Manag., 120, 772, 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.11.001 · DOI
  3. Bass, 1969, A new product growth model for consumer durables, Math. Model Market., 132, 215
  4. Bel, 2016, Effects of unit-based pricing on household waste collection demand: a meta-regression analysis, Resour. Energy Econ., 44, 169, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.03.003 · DOI
  5. Chikowore, 2021, Factors influencing household waste management practices in Zimbabwe, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., 23, 386, 10.1007/s10163-020-01129-9 · DOI
  6. Chen, 2017, Source separation of municipal solid waste: the effects of different separation methods and citizens' inclination—case study of Changsha, China, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 67, 182, 10.1080/10962247.2016.1222317 · DOI
  7. Guo, 2016, System dynamics-based evaluation of interventions to promote appropriate waste disposal behaviors in low-income urban areas: a Baltimore case study, Waste Manag., 56, 547, 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.019 · DOI
  8. Han, 2017, The impact of the policy of municipal solid waste source-separated collection on waste reduction: a case study of China, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., 19, 382, 10.1007/s10163-015-0434-3 · DOI
  9. Han, 2020, Research on Residents' adoption of ecological environment behavior under the influence of hypothetical media - empirical Analysis Based on the classification of municipal solid waste in Shanghai, J. China Univ. Geosci., 20, 114
  10. Inghels, 2010, An analysis of household waste management policy using system dynamics modelling, Waste Manag. Res., 29, 351, 10.1177/0734242X10373800 · DOI
  11. Knickmeyer, 2020, Social factors influencing household waste separation: a literature review on good practices to improve the recycling performance of urban areas, J. Clean. Prod., 245, 118605, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118605 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Luo, 2020, The impacts of social interaction-based factors on household waste-related behaviors, Waste Manag., 118, 270, 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.046 · DOI
  13. Ma, 2020, The effect of policy instruments on rural households' solid waste separation behavior and the mediation of perceived value using SEM, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser., 27, 19398, 10.1007/s11356-020-08410-2 · DOI
  14. Noorderhaven, 1996, Opportunism and trust in transaction cost economics, Trans. Cost Econ. Beyond, 48, 105, 10.1007/978-94-009-1800-9_6 · DOI
  15. Pedersen, 2020, The hidden dynamics of household waste separation: an anthropological analysis of user commitment, barriers, and the gaps between a waste system and its users, J. Clean. Prod., 242, 116285, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.281 · DOI
  16. Pei, 2019, Roles of neighborhood ties, community attachment and local identity in residents' household waste recycling intention, J. Clean. Prod., 241, 118217, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118217 · DOI
  17. Pinha, 2020, A system dynamics modelling approach for municipal solid waste management and financial analysis, J. Clean. Prod., 269, 122350, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122350 · DOI
  18. Qian, 2019, From incentive to mandatory: practice mode, logical transformation and implementation path of urban community waste classification, J. East China Univ. Sci. Technol., 34, 83
  19. Razali, 2020, Waste separation at source behaviour among Malaysian households: the Theory of Planned Behaviour with moral norm, J. Clean. Prod., 271, 122025, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122025 · DOI
  20. Sukholthaman, 2016, A system dynamics model to evaluate effects of source separation of municipal solid waste management: a case of Bangkok, Thailand, Waste Manag., 52, 50, 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.026 · DOI
  21. Ulli-Beer, 2007, Financing a competitive recycling initiative in Switzerland, Ecol. Econ., 62, 727, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.017 · DOI
  22. Valente, 2019, The effects of pricing waste generation: a synthetic control approach, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 96, 274, 10.1016/j.jeem.2019.06.004 · DOI
  23. Wang, 2020, From intention to behavior: comprehending residents' waste sorting intention and behavior formation process, Waste Manag., 113, 41, 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.031 · DOI
  24. Wang, 2021, Benefits analysis of classification of municipal solid waste based on system dynamics, J. Clean. Prod., 279, 123686, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123686 · DOI
  25. Xiao, 2020, Policy impacts on Municipal Solid Waste management in Shanghai: a system dynamics model analysis, J. Clean. Prod., 262, 121366, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121366 · DOI
  26. Xu, 2018, Economic incentive and social influence to overcome household waste separation dilemma: a field intervention study, Waste Manag., 77, 522, 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.048 · DOI
  27. Ye, 2020, China's green future and household solid waste: challenges and prospects, Waste Manag., 105, 328, 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.02.025 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Li, W., & Wang, J.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
321
Pages
128980
ISSN
0959-6526
Cited by
25
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Beijing Municipal Office of Philosophy and Social Science Planning (2020CJJ082)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review