CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 77Geotechnical and construction materials studiesGeotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationMaterials Engineering and Processing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine learning approach for predicting and evaluating California bearing ratio of stabilized soil containing industrial waste

Ho, Lanh Si, Tran, Van Quan·2022·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133587
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133587

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Al-Refeai, 1997, Prediction of CBR using dynamic cone penetrometer, J. King Saud Univ.-Eng. Sci., 9, 191, 10.1016/S1018-3639(18)30676-7 · DOI
  2. Alam, 2020, Prediction of CBR value of fine grained soils of Bengal Basin by genetic expression programming, artificial neural network and krigging method, J. Geol. Soc. India, 95, 190, 10.1007/s12594-020-1409-0 · DOI
  3. Alawi, 2013, Prediction of California bearing ratio of subbase layer using multiple linear regression models, Road Mater. Pavement Des., 14, 211, 10.1080/14680629.2012.757557 · DOI
  4. Bardhan, 2021, Efficient computational techniques for predicting the California bearing ratio of soil in soaked conditions, Eng. Geol., 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106239 · DOI
  5. Black, 1962, A method of estimating the California bearing ratio of cohesive soils from plasticity data, Geotechnique, 12, 271, 10.1680/geot.1962.12.4.271 · DOI
  6. Boosting Algorithms: Regularization, Prediction and Model Fitting, (n.d.). https://projecteuclid.org/journals/statistical-science/volume-22/issue-4/Boosting-Algorithms-Regularization-Prediction-and-Model-Fitting/10.1214/07-STS242.full (accessed October 29, 2021). · DOI
  7. Breiman, 2001, Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5, 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bui, 2016, Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree, Landslides, 13, 361, 10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6 · DOI
  9. Caldeira, 2019, Solving the flexible job shop scheduling problem using an improved Jaya algorithm, Comput. Ind. Eng., 137, 10.1016/j.cie.2019.106064 · DOI
  10. Chang, 2010, Fast agglomerative clustering using information of k-nearest neighbors, Pattern Recogn., 43, 3958, 10.1016/j.patcog.2010.06.021 · DOI
  11. Chou, 2014, Machine learning in concrete strength simulations: multi-nation data analytics, Construct. Build. Mater., 73, 771, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.054 · DOI
  12. Cortes, 1995, Support-vector networks, Mach. Learn., 20, 273, 10.1023/A:1022627411411 · DOI
  13. Duan, 2013, Prediction of compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete using artificial neural networks, Construct. Build. Mater., 40, 1200, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.063 · DOI
  14. Erzin, 2016, Use of neural networks for the prediction of the CBR value of some Aegean sands, Neural Comput. Appl., 27, 1415, 10.1007/s00521-015-1943-7 · DOI
  15. Farias, 2018, Prediction of California bearing ratio from index properties of soils using parametric and non-parametric models, Geotech. Geol. Eng., 36, 3485, 10.1007/s10706-018-0548-1 · DOI
  16. Friedman, 2001, Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine, Ann. Stat., 29, 1189, 10.1214/aos/1013203451 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Gardner, 1998, Artificial neural networks (the multilayer perceptron)—a review of applications in the atmospheric sciences, Atmos. Environ., 32, 2627, 10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00447-0 · DOI
  18. Ghorbani, 2018, Prediction of UCS and CBR of microsilica-lime stabilized sulfate silty sand using ANN and EPR models; application to the deep soil mixing, Soils Found., 58, 34, 10.1016/j.sandf.2017.11.002 · DOI
  19. Goldstein, 2015, Peeking inside the black box: visualizing statistical learning with plots of individual conditional expectation, J. Comput. Graph Stat., 24, 44, 10.1080/10618600.2014.907095 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Gong, 2021, Evidential instance selection for K-nearest neighbor classification of big data, Int. J. Approx. Reason., 138, 123, 10.1016/j.ijar.2021.08.006 · DOI
  21. Ikeagwuani, 2021, Estimation of modified expansive soil CBR with multivariate adaptive regression splines, random forest and gradient boosting machine, Innov. Infrastruct. Solut., 6, 1, 10.1007/s41062-021-00568-z · DOI
  22. Islam, 2020, Prediction of California bearing ratio of fine-grained soil stabilized with admixtures using soft computing systems, J. Civ. Eng. Sci. Technol., 11, 28, 10.33736/jcest.2035.2020 · DOI
  23. Jacobson, 2004, Analyzing the performance of generalized hill climbing algorithms, J. Heuristics, 10, 387, 10.1023/B:HEUR.0000034712.48917.a9 · DOI
  24. Kang, 2021, Machine learning-based prediction for compressive and flexural strengths of steel fiber-reinforced concrete, Construct. Build. Mater., 266, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121117 · DOI
  25. Kato, 2018, A new approach to solve the flexible job shop problem based on a hybrid particle swarm optimization and random-restart hill climbing, Comput. Ind. Eng., 125, 178, 10.1016/j.cie.2018.08.022 · DOI
  26. Lu, 2021, Global sensitivity analysis in epidemiological modeling, Eur. J. Oper. Res.
  27. Naser, 2021, An engineer's guide to eXplainable Artificial Intelligence and Interpretable Machine Learning: navigating causality, forced goodness, and the false perception of inference, Autom. ConStruct., 129, 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103821 · DOI
  28. Nguyen, 2020, Soft-computing techniques for prediction of soils consolidation coefficient, Catena, 195, 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104802 · DOI
  29. Nguyen, 2021, Influence of data splitting on performance of machine learning models in prediction of shear strength of soil, Math. Probl. Eng., 2021, 10.1155/2021/4832864 · DOI
  30. Oluwatuyi, 2018, Ameliorating effect of milled eggshell on cement stabilized lateritic soil for highway construction, Case Stud. Constr. Mater., 9
  31. Paneiro, 2021, Artificial neural network with a cross-validation approach to blast-induced ground vibration propagation modeling, Undergr. Space, 6, 281, 10.1016/j.undsp.2020.03.002 · DOI
  32. Patrick, 2012, Comparison of simulated annealing and hill climbing in the course timetabling problem, Afr. J. Math. Comput. Sci. Res., 5, 176
  33. Pham, 2021, A comparative study of soft computing models for prediction of permeability coefficient of soil, Math. Probl. Eng., 2021, 10.1155/2021/7631493 · DOI
  34. Poli, 2014, Solar flare detection system based on tolerance near sets in a GPU–CUDA framework, Knowl.-Based Syst., 70, 345, 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.07.012 · DOI
  35. Pongsivasathit, 2019, Assessment of mechanical properties of cement stabilized soils, Case Stud. Constr. Mater., 11
  36. Pradhan, 2013, A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS, Comput. Geosci., 51, 350, 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.023 · DOI
  37. Qin, 2019, An effective hybrid discrete grey wolf optimizer for the casting production scheduling problem with multi-objective and multi-constraint, Comput. Ind. Eng., 128, 458, 10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.061 · DOI
  38. Rajakumar, 2021, Experimental study and neural network modelling of expansive sub grade stabilized with industrial waste by-products and geogrid, Mater. Today Proc., 46, 131, 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.578 · DOI
  39. Sabat, 2015, Prediction of California bearing ratio of a stabilized expansive soil using artificial neural network and support vector machine, Electron. J. Geotech. Eng., 20, 981
  40. Samui, 2008, Support vector machine applied to settlement of shallow foundations on cohesionless soils, Comput. Geotech., 35, 419, 10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.06.014 · DOI
  41. Suthar, 2018, Predicting CBR value of stabilized pond ash with lime and lime sludge using ANN and MR models, Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng., 4, 1, 10.1007/s40891-017-0125-3 · DOI
  42. Taskiran, 2010, Prediction of California bearing ratio (CBR) of fine grained soils by AI methods, Adv. Eng. Software, 41, 886, 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.01.003 · DOI
  43. Tella, 2021, Spatial assessment of PM10 hotspots using random forest, K-nearest neighbour and naïve bayes, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 12, 10.1016/j.apr.2021.101202 · DOI
  44. Tenpe, 2020, Utilization of support vector models and gene expression programming for soil strength modeling, Arabian J. Sci. Eng., 45, 4301, 10.1007/s13369-020-04441-6 · DOI
  45. Tien Bui, 2012, Landslide susceptibility assessment in vietnam using support vector machines, decision tree, and Naive Bayes Models, Math. Probl. Eng., 2012, 10.1155/2012/974638 · DOI
  46. Tinoco, 2014, Support vector machines applied to uniaxial compressive strength prediction of jet grouting columns, Comput. Geotech., 55, 132, 10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.08.010 · DOI
  47. Tran, 2022, Evaluating compressive strength of concrete made with recycled concrete aggregates using machine learning approach, Construct. Build. Mater., 323
  48. Trong, 2021, On random subspace optimization-based hybrid computing models predicting the California bearing ratio of soils, Materials, 14, 6516, 10.3390/ma14216516 · DOI
  49. Uğuz, 2011, A two-stage feature selection method for text categorization by using information gain, principal component analysis and genetic algorithm, Knowl.-Based Syst., 24, 1024, 10.1016/j.knosys.2011.04.014 · DOI
  50. Varghese, 2013, Artificial neural networks: a solution to the ambiguity in prediction of engineering properties of fine-grained soils, Geotech. Geol. Eng., 31, 1187, 10.1007/s10706-013-9643-5 · DOI
  51. Vaughan, 2007, Analyzing the performance of simultaneous generalized hill climbing algorithms, Comput. Optim. Appl., 37, 103, 10.1007/s10589-007-9019-y · DOI
  52. Vinodhkumar, 2016, Artificial neural network modelling and economic analysis of black cotton soil subgrade stabilized with flyash and geotextile, Int. J. Earth Sci. Eng., 9, 81
  53. Xing-xing, 2021, Predicting CBR value of stabilized pond ash with lime and lime sludge using multivariate adaptive regression splines, Eng. Res. Express., 3, 10.1088/2631-8695/ac3c9f · DOI
  54. Yao, 2006, A Regression-based K nearest neighbor algorithm for gene function prediction from heterogeneous data, BMC Bioinf., 7, S11, 10.1186/1471-2105-7-S1-S11 · DOI
  55. Yildirim, 2011, Estimation of California bearing ratio by using soft computing systems, Expert Syst. Appl., 38, 6381, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.054 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Ho, L. S., & Tran, V. Q.
Affiliations
University Of Transport Technology (VN)
Corresponding author
Tran, Van Quan
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
370
Pages
133587
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133587
OpenAlex
W4293203128
Cited by
77
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 14
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Materials Engineering and Processing
Keywords
California bearing ratio, stabilized soil, industrial waste, cement stabilization, machine learning prediction, random forest, gradient boosting, hybrid model, feature importance, plasticity index, cement content, Atterberg limits, optimum moisture content, maximum dry density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review