The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reitsma, J. B., Glas, A. S., Rutjes, A. W. S., Scholten, R. J. P. M., Bossuyt, P. M., & Zwinderman, A. H. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.02.022 · Cited by 3,369
What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta‐analysis of sparse data
J. Sweeting, M., J. Sutton, A., & C. Lambert, P. (2004) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1761 · Cited by 1,734
Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression
van Houwelingen, H. C., Arends, L. R., & Stijnen, T. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1040 · Cited by 1,580
Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal, and Structural Equation Models
Skrondal, A., & Rabe‐Hesketh, S. (2004) · Thammasat University Digital Collections · Cited by 1,505
Radiological Evaluation of Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis
Scheidler, J. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550130070040 · Cited by 320
Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal, and Structural Equation Models
Corrado, L. (2005) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2005.s25 · Cited by 176
Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis
Scheidler, J. E. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.278.13.1096 · Cited by 70
Cited by
Gilbody, S., Richards, D., Brealey, S., & Hewitt, C. (2007) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0333-y · Cited by 1,290
Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker for sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wacker, C., Prkno, A., Brunkhorst, F. M., & Schlattmann, P. (2013) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(12)70323-7 · Cited by 1,198
Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
Leeflang, M. M. G., Deeks, J. J., Gatsonis, C., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00008 · Cited by 1,124
Creavin, S. T., Wisniewski, S., Noel-Storr, A. H., Trevelyan, C. M., Hampton, T., Rayment, D., Thom, V. M., Nash, K. J. E., Elhamoui, H., Milligan, R., et al. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011145.pub2 · Cited by 820
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
(2023) · doi:10.1002/9781119756194 · Cited by 757
Metadata
- Authors
- Chu, H., & Cole, S. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1331-1332
- ISSN
- 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968038365
- Cited by
- 708
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 5.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.011
- The paper
- Chu, H., & Cole, S. R. (2006). Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
