The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Updating methods improved the performance of a clinical prediction model in new patients
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
A critical look at methods for handling missing covariates in epidemiologic regression analyses.
Greenland, S., & Finkle, W. D. (1995) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117592 · Cited by 891
Vergouwe, Y., Steyerberg, E. W., Eijkemans, M. J. C., & Habbema, J. D. F. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.017 · Cited by 636
Self-citationPreoperative prediction of severe postoperative pain
Kalkman, J. C., Visser, K., Moen, J., Bonsel, J. G., Grobbee, E. D., & Moons, M. K. G. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00252-5 · Cited by 616
Two Further Applications of a Model for Binary Regression
Cox, D. R. (1958) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2333203 · Cited by 557
Validation of probabilistic predictions
Miller, M. E., Langefeld, C. D., Tierney, W. M., Hui, S. L., & McDonald, C. J. (1993) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x9301300107 · Cited by 129
Cited by
Moons, K. G. M., Altman, D. G., Reitsma, J. B., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Macaskill, P., Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Ransohoff, D. F., & Collins, G. S. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-0698 · Cited by 5,147
Self-citationMoons, K. G. M., de Groot, J. A. H., Bouwmeester, W., Vergouwe, Y., Mallett, S., Altman, D. G., Reitsma, J. B., & Collins, G. S. (2014) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001744 · Cited by 2,018
“When a review includes both development and validation studies of the same model(s), or several external validations of the same model, reporting differences in frequency (binary) and distribution (continuous) of the predictors and outcomes across the study samples is recommended, as a different case-mix is known to r…”
BackgroundSelf-citationPrognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model Research
Steyerberg, E. W., Moons, K. G. M., van der Windt, D. A., Hayden, J. A., Perel, P., Schroter, S., Riley, R. D., Hemingway, H., Altman, D. G., & for the PROGRESS Group (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001381 · Cited by 1,508
Self-citationRisk prediction models: II. External validation, model updating, and impact assessment
Moons, K. G. M., Kengne, A. P., Grobbee, D. E., Royston, P., Vergouwe, Y., Altman, D. G., & Woodward, M. (2012) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2011-301247 · Cited by 1,195
Self-citationPrognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice
Moons, K. G. M., Altman, D. G., Vergouwe, Y., & Royston, P. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b606 · Cited by 934
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Janssen, K. J. M., Moons, K. G. M., Kalkman, C. J., Grobbee, D. E., & Vergouwe, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-86
- ISSN
- 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079776874
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Updating methods improved the performance of a clinical prediction model in new patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.018
- The paper
- Janssen, K. J. M., Moons, K. G. M., Kalkman, C. J., Grobbee, D. E., & Vergouwe, Y. (2008). Updating methods improved the performance of a clinical prediction model in new patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
