The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Knowledge translation is the use of knowledge in health care decision making
Abstract
Objective To provide an overview of the science and practice of knowledge translation.Study design Narrative review outlining what knowledge translation is and a framework for its use.Results Knowledge translation is defined as the use of knowledge in practice and decision making by the public, patients, health care professionals, managers, and policy makers. Failures to use research evidence to inform decision making are apparent across all these key decision maker groups. There are several proposed theories and frameworks for achieving knowledge translation. A conceptual framework developed by Graham et al., termed the knowledge-to-action cycle, provides an approach that builds on the commonalities found in an assessment of planned action theories.Conclusions Review of the evidence base for the science and practice of knowledge translation has identified several gaps including the need to develop valid strategies for assessing the determinants of knowledge use and for evaluating sustainability of knowledge translation interventions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In particular, they may improve the likelihood of successful implementation and sustainability [1,2].”
From Scoping review identifies significant number of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks with limited use (2018) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
Institute of Medicine (2000) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/9728 · Cited by 14,390
Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?: A Framework for Improvement
Cabana, M. D., Rand, C. S., Powe, N. R., Wu, A. W., Wilson, M. H., Abboud, P.-A. C., & Rubin, H. R. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.15.1458 · Cited by 6,677
Wall, A. (2000) · British Journal of Healthcare Management · doi:10.12968/bjhc.2000.6.9.19311 · Cited by 5,912
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States
McGlynn, E. A., Asch, S. M., Adams, J., Keesey, J., Hicks, J., DeCristofaro, A., & Kerr, E. A. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa022615 · Cited by 5,079
Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map?
Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.47 · Cited by 4,705
Self-citationLégaré, F., Ratté, S., Gravel, K., & Graham, I. D. (2008) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.018 · Cited by 1,321
Self-citationEffect of Statins on Risk of Coronary Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
LaRosa, J. C., He, J., & Vupputuri, S. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.24.2340 · Cited by 1,246
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in ambulatory care
Arnold, S. R., & Straus, S. E. (2005) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003539.pub2 · Cited by 741
Self-citationThe case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect
Davis, D., Davis, M. E., Jadad, A., Perrier, L., Rath, D., Ryan, D., Sibbald, G., Straus, S. E., Rappolt, S., Wowk, M., et al. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7405.33 · Cited by 706
Self-citationWells, G. A., Cranney, A., Peterson, J., Boucher, M., Shea, B., Welch, V. A., Coyle, D., & Tugwell, P. (2008) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003376.pub3 · Cited by 518
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- McKibbon KA, Lokker C, Wilczynski NL, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Davis DA, et al. A descriptive study of the magnitude of the “Tower of Babel” problem for knowledge/information/research dissemination/diffusion/management/synthesis/exchange/implementation/mobilization/transfer/translation/transformation/uptake/utilization. Implementation Science (in press).
- Graham ID, Harrison MB, Logan J and the KT Theories Research Group. A review of planned change (knowledge translation) models, frameworks and theories. Paper presented at: The JBI International Convention; November 2005; Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M., Levac, D., Ng, C., Sharpe, J. P., Wilson, K., et al. (2016) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4 · Cited by 2,250
“End-of-grant knowledge translation activities [19, 20] were defined as the typical dissemination and implementation activities undertaken by researchers to help ensure that end users are aware of the study findings, beyond publication.”
BackgroundSelf-citationEvaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research
Fazey, I., Hardt, L., Msika, J., Pinke, M., Preedy, K. F., Evely, A. C., Lambert, E., Hastings, E., Morris, S., & Reed, M. S. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.012 · Cited by 335
“Perhaps not surprisingly then, knowledge exchange is increasingly being recognised as a research field in its own right (Straus et al., 2011).”
BackgroundStrifler, L., Cardoso, R., McGowan, J., Cogo, E., Nincic, V., Khan, P. A., Scott, A., Ghassemi, M., MacDonald, H., Lai, Y., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.04.008 · Cited by 227
“In particular, they may improve the likelihood of successful implementation and sustainability [1,2].”
BackgroundSelf-citationNyström, M. E., Karltun, J., Keller, C., & Gäre, B. A. (2018) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-018-0322-0 · Cited by 238
Kaplow, J. B., Rolon‐Arroyo, B., Layne, C. M., Rooney, E. E., Oosterhoff, B. J., Hill, R. M., Steinberg, A. M., Lotterman, J., Gallagher, K. A. S., & Pynoos, R. S. (2019) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2018.10.019 · Cited by 175
“To inform the clinical utility of the RI-5, a single diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR; ie, sensitivity divided by the false alarm rate) was estimated based on the RI-5 total scale score that maximized sensitivity and specificity as indicated by ROC analyses.(37) A DLR is a data-driven diagnostic efficiency statistic t…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J. M., & Graham, I. D.
- Affiliations
- St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Straus, Sharon E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-10
- ISSN
- 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086381401
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 16.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Keywords
- knowledge translation, knowledge-to-action cycle, healthcare decision-making, research utilization, health policy makers, healthcare workers
- MeSH terms
- Canada, Decision Making, Health Services Research, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Evidence-Based Medicine, Knowledge, Information Dissemination, Translational Research, Biomedical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
