CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 291Coronary Interventions and DiagnosticsCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender and the Extent of Coronary Atherosclerosis, Plaque Composition, and Clinical Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndromes

Open access
Lansky, Alexandra J., Ng, Vivian G., Maehara, Akiko, Weisz, Giora, Lerman, Amir, Mintz, Gary S., De Bruyne, Bernard, Farhat, Naim, Niess, Gary, Jankovic, Ivana, Lazar, Dana, Xu, Ke, Fahy, Martin, Serruys, Patrick W., Stone, Gregg W.·2012·JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
DOI 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.02.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to assess the extent and composition of atherosclerosis contributing to acute coronary syndrome events in women compared with men. Background Pathological studies suggest that plaque composition and burden may differ by sex. It is unclear whether sex impacts the extent, characteristics, and potential vulnerability of coronary plaques. Methods A total of 697 patients (24% women) with acute coronary syndromes were enrolled in the prospective, multicenter PROSPECT (Providing Regional Observations to Study Predictors of Events in the Coronary Tree) study. Three-vessel multimodality intracoronary imaging (quantitative coronary angiography, grayscale, and radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound [IVUS]) was performed after treatment of the culprit lesion(s). Events during a median 3.4-year follow-up were ascribed to recurrent culprit versus untreated nonculprit lesions. The authors performed a post hoc, sex-based subgroup analysis. Results Women were older and had more comorbid disease than men. By angiography, women had a similar number of angiographic culprit (p = 0.53) but fewer nonculprit (p = 0.05) lesions, and fewer vessels with nonculprit lesions (p = 0.048) compared with men even after multivariable adjustment (p = 0.002). By IVUS, women had fewer nonculprit lesions (p = 0.002), but similar plaque burden (PB) per lesion (55.6% vs. 55.3%; p = 0.35), and female sex was not predictive of severe (> 70%) PB (p = 0.052). Plaque rupture was less common in women (6.6% vs. 16.3%; p = 0.002) even after adjusting for comorbidities (p = 0.004), as was the total necrotic core volume (p < 0.0001). The frequency of other plaque phenotypes was similar for men and women including pathological intimal thickening, thin-cap fibroatheromas (TCFA), and thick-cap fibroatheromas. Rates of major adverse cardiovascular events attributed to culprit and nonculprit lesions at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up were not significantly different between men and women, although women were rehospitalized more frequently due to culprit lesion-related angina. For men, nonculprit lesion minimal lumen area ≤ 4.0 mm(2), PB ≥70%, and TCFA predicted nonculprit MACE at 3 years, whereas for women, only TCFA and PB were predictive. Conclusions The PROSPECT study validates that despite having more comorbid risk factors than men, women have less extensive coronary artery disease by both angiographic and IVUS measures, and that lesions in women compared with men have less plaque rupture, less necrotic core and calcium, similar plaque burden, and smaller lumens. TCFA may also be a stronger marker of plaque vulnerability in women than men.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.02.003

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 39 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–291 of 291

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lansky, A. J., Ng, V. G., Maehara, A., Weisz, G., Lerman, A., Mintz, G. S., De Bruyne, B., Farhat, N., Niess, G., Jankovic, I., Lazar, D., Xu, K., Fahy, M., Serruys, P. W., & Stone, G. W.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Presbyterian Hospital (US)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Lansky, Alexandra J.
ORCID
Venue
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
S62-S72
ISSN
  • 1876-7591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-878X
DOI
10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.02.003
OpenAlex
W2079106078
Cited by
289
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
20.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • InfraRedx
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
acute coronary syndrome, sex differences, coronary artery disease, plaque composition, plaque burden, plaque rupture, necrotic core, thin-cap fibroatheroma, non-culprit lesions, major adverse cardiovascular events, women, intravascular ultrasound, quantitative coronary angiography, culprit lesion, hospital readmission, angina pectoris, PROSPECT study
MeSH terms
Aged, Angina, Unstable, Coronary Artery Disease, Europe, Female, Fibrosis, Heart Arrest, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Necrosis, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Time Factors, United States, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Multivariate Analysis, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Coronary Angiography, Ultrasonography, Interventional, Risk Assessment, Coronary Stenosis, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Plaque, Atherosclerotic, Vascular Calcification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review