Evaluation of a Deep Learning–Based Automated CT Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Algorithm
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other studies that investigated deep learning algorithms for automated coronary calcium quantification used smaller cohorts or proprietary technologies.
“Although other studies have investigated deep learning algorithms for automated coronary calcium quantification34–42, they used smaller cohorts or proprietary technologies.”
From Deep convolutional neural networks to predict cardiovascular risk from computed tomography (2021) · cites this paper as [42]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Wolterink, J. M., Leiner, T., de Vos, B. D., van Hamersvelt, R. W., Viergever, M. A., & Išgum, I. (2016) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.04.004 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep convolutional neural networks to predict cardiovascular risk from computed tomography
Zeleznik, R., Foldyna, B., Eslami, P., Weiss, J., Alexander, I., Taron, J., Parmar, C., Alvi, R. M., Banerji, D., Uno, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-20966-2 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
- Authors
- Martin, S. S., van Assen, M., Rapaka, S., Hudson, H. T., Fischer, A. M., Varga-Szemes, A., Sahbaee, P., Schwemmer, C., Gulsun, M. A., Cimen, S., Sharma, P., Vogl, T. J., & Schoepf, U. J.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schoepf, U. Joseph
- ORCID
- Venue
- JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 524-526
- ISSN
- 1876-7591 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-878X
- OpenAlex
- W2989141122
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- JACC. Cardiovascular imaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- coronary artery calcium score, deep learning, coronary CT angiography, coronary artery calcification, computer-aided detection, coronary artery disease
- MeSH terms
- Computed Tomography Angiography, Deep Learning, Aged, Automation, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Vessels, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Software, Reproducibility of Results, Coronary Angiography, Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques, Vascular Calcification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
