Cited by 266Temporomandibular Joint DisordersMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

The hierarchy of different treatments for arthrogenous temporomandibular disorders: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Al-Moraissi, Essam Ahmed, Wolford, Larry M., Ellis, Edward, Neff, Andreas·2020·Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract

Purpose Different treatment options for patients with arthrogenous Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) have been reported. However, evidence regarding the most effective intervention using network meta-analysis (NMA) has not been performed. Thus, we conducted a NMA of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to identify the most effective treatment of arthrogenous TMDs with respect to pain reduction and improved mouth opening, and to generate a ranking according to their effectiveness. Material and methods An electronic search on three major databases was undertaken to identify RCTs published before August 2019, comparing up to fourteen different treatments against control/placebo patients for arthrogenous TMDs with respect to pain reduction and improved mouth opening. The treatment variables were controls/placebo, conservative treatment (muscle exercises and occlusal splint therapy), occlusal splint therapy alone, intraarticular injection (IAI) of hyaluronic acid (HA) or corticosteroid (CS), arthrocentesis with or without HA, CS and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), arthroscopy with or without HA and PRP, open joint surgery, and physiotherapy. Frequentist NMA was performed using STATA software. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were divided according to the length of follow-up (short-term (≤5 months) and intermediate-term (≥6 months to 4 years) and type of TMJ arthrogenous disorders; internal derangement (ID) and TMJ osteoarthritis (OA). The standardized mean differences (SMD) in pos…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.10.004

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Moraissi, E. A., Wolford, L. M., Ellis, E., & Neff, A.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE)
Venue
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
9-23
ISSN
1010-5182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2984565522
Cited by
266
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Keywords
temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis, internal derangement, intra-articular injection, hyaluronic acid, corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, arthroscopic surgery, arthrocentesis, occlusal splint, muscular exercise, physiotherapy, analgesia, mouth opening, treatment ranking
MeSH terms
Arthrocentesis, Humans, Injections, Intra-Articular, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review