The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid Syllable Transitions (ReST) treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: The effect of lower dose-Frequency
Abstract
Unlabelled This study investigated the effectiveness of twice-weekly Rapid Syllable Transitions (ReST) treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS). ReST is an effective treatment at a frequency of four sessions a week for three consecutive weeks. In this study we used a multiple-baselines across participants design to examine treatment efficacy for four children with CAS, aged four to eight years, who received ReST treatment twice a week for six weeks. The children's ability to acquire new skills, generalize these skills to untreated items and maintain the skills after treatment was examined. All four children improved their production of the target items. Two of the four children generalized the treatment effects to similar untreated pseudo words and all children generalized to untreated real words. During the maintenance phase, all four participants maintained their skills to four months post-treatment, with a stable rather than rising profile. This study shows that ReST treatment delivered twice-weekly results in significant retention of treatment effects to four months post-treatment and generalization to untrained but related speech behaviors. Compared to ReST therapy four times per week, the twice-weekly frequency produces similar treatment gains but no ongoing improvement after the cessation of treatment. This implies that there may be a small but significant benefit of four times weekly therapy compared with twice-weekly ReST therapy. Learning outcomes Readers wil…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The therapeutic efficacy of clinician-led ReST is supported by several single-case experimental studies and randomized controlled trials.
“The therapeutic efficacy of clinician-led ReST is supported by several single-case experimental studies (e.g., Thomas et al., 2014Thomas et al., , 2016) ) and randomized controlled trials (e.g., McCabe et al., 2023;Murray et al., 2015).”
From Equipping Speech-Language Clinicians for the Critical Appraisal of an Artificial Intelligence–Driven, Evidence-Based Future (2025) · cites this paper as Thomas et al., 2014
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Single-Subject Treatment Research: Lessons Learned from the Aphasia Literature
Beeson, P. M., & Robey, R. R. (2006) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-006-9013-7 · Cited by 549
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Allen, 2013, Intervention efficacy and intensity for children with speech sound disorder, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 865, 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0076) · DOI
- Baas, 2008, Treatment of severe childhood apraxia of speech in a 12-year-old male with CHARGE association, Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 16
- Baker, 2012, Optimal intervention intensity, International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 401, 10.3109/17549507.2012.700323 · DOI
- Baker, 2011, Evidence-based practice for children with speech sound disorders: Part 1 Narrative review, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 102, 10.1044/0161-1461(2010/09-0075) · DOI
- Ballard, 2001, Response generalization in apraxia of speech treatments: Taking another look, Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 3, 10.1016/S0021-9924(00)00038-1 · DOI
- Ballard, 2007, Treating control of voicing in apraxia of speech with variable practice, Aphasiology, 21, 1195, 10.1080/02687030601047858 · DOI
- Ballard, 2010, A treatment for dysprosody in childhood apraxia of speech, Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Research, 53, 1227, 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0130) · DOI
- Barratt, 1992, Trial of intensive compared with weekly speech therapy in preschool children, Archives of Disease in Childhood, 67, 106, 10.1136/adc.67.1.106 · DOI
- Bislick, 2012, Do principles of motor learning enhance retention and transfer of speech skills? A systematic review, Aphasiology, 26, 709, 10.1080/02687038.2012.676888 · DOI
- Gozzard, 2006, Children's productions of polysyllables, ACQuiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing, 8, 113
- Hall, 1990, A Child with signs of developmental apraxia of speech with whom a palatal lift prosthesis was used to manage palatal dysfunction, Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 454, 10.1044/jshd.5503.454 · DOI
- Law, 2012, Cost-effectiveness of interventions for children with speech, language and communication needs (SLCN): A review using the Drummond and Jefferson (1996) ‘Referee's Checklist’, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47, 1, 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00084.x · DOI
- Lewis, 2004, School-age follow-up of children with childhood apraxia of speech, Language, Speech & Hearing Services in the Schools, 35, 122, 10.1044/0161-1461(2004/014) · DOI
- Maas, 2012, Feedback frequency in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 239, 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0119) · DOI
- Maas, 2012, Random versus blocked practice in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 561, 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0120) · DOI
- Maas, 2008, Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 277, 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/025) · DOI
- Morgan, 2008, Intervention for childhood apraxia of speech, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD006278
- Mullen, 2010, The national outcomes measurement system for pediatric speech-language pathology, Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 44, 10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0051) · DOI
- Murray, 2012, A comparison of two treatments for childhood apraxia of speech: Methods and treatment protocol for a parallel group randomised control trial, BMC Pediatrics, 12, 112, 10.1186/1471-2431-12-112 · DOI
- Murray, 2014, A systematic review of treatment outcomes for children with childhood apraxia of speech, American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0035 · DOI
- Robbins, 1987, Clinical assessment of oropharyngeal motor development in young children, Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 271, 10.1044/jshd.5203.271 · DOI
- Ruggero, 2012, Paediatric speech–language pathology service delivery: An exploratory survey of Australian parents, International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 338, 10.3109/17549507.2011.650213 · DOI
- Skinder-Meredith, 2001, Differential diagnosis: Developmental apraxia of speech and phonologic delay, Augmentative Communication News, 14, 5
- Spielman, 2007, Effects of an extended version of the Lee Silverman voice treatment on voice and speech in Parkinson's disease, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 95, 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/014) · DOI
- Ukrainetz, 2009, Foreword, Topics in Language Disorders, 29, 291, 10.1097/TLD.0b013e3181c97821 · DOI
- Wambaugh, 2013, Treatment for acquired apraxia of speech: Examination of treatment intensity and practice schedule, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22, 84, 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/12-0025) · DOI
- Warren, 2007, Differential treatment intensity research: A missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions, Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 70, 10.1002/mrdd.20139 · DOI
- Watts, 2009, Lack of randomized controlled trials prohibits analysis of effectiveness for the treatment of childhood apraxia of speech: A systematic review of quasi-experimental group designs and single-subject experimental designs is needed, Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 3, 8, 10.1080/17489530902732924 · DOI
- Williams, 2000, Multiple oppositions: Case studies of variables in phonological intervention, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 289, 10.1044/1058-0360.0904.289 · DOI
- Wohlert, 2004, Service delivery variables and outcomes of treatment for hypokinetic dysarthria in Parkinson disease, Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 235
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Benway, N. R., & Preston, J. L. (2025) · Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2025_lshss-24-00085 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, D. C., McCabe, P., & Ballard, K. J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Thomas, Donna C.
- Venue
- Journal of Communication Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 51
- Pages
- 29-42
- ISSN
- 0021-9924 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066761658
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Communication Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Keywords
- childhood apraxia of speech, speech therapy intervention, skill acquisition, generalization, maintenance of treatment effects, intervention intensity
- MeSH terms
- Apraxias, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Speech Therapy, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review