Computer-based speech therapy for childhood speech sound disorders
Abstract
Background With the current worldwide workforce shortage of Speech-Language Pathologists, new and innovative ways of delivering therapy to children with speech sound disorders are needed. Computer-based speech therapy may be an effective and viable means of addressing service access issues for children with speech sound disorders. Aim To evaluate the efficacy of computer-based speech therapy programs for children with speech sound disorders. Method Studies reporting the efficacy of computer-based speech therapy programs were identified via a systematic, computerised database search. Key study characteristics, results, main findings and details of computer-based speech therapy programs were extracted. The methodological quality was evaluated using a structured critical appraisal tool. Main contribution 14 studies were identified and a total of 11 computer-based speech therapy programs were evaluated. The results showed that computer-based speech therapy is associated with positive clinical changes for some children with speech sound disorders. Conclusions There is a need for collaborative research between computer engineers and clinicians, particularly during the design and development of computer-based speech therapy programs. Evaluation using rigorous experimental designs is required to understand the benefits of computer-based speech therapy. Learning outcomes The reader will be able to 1) discuss how computerbased speech therapy has the potential to improve service access…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing systems generally lack sufficient technical description of the details underlying their development.
“The second obstacle is that existing systems generally lack sufficient technical description of the details underlying their development.”
From Equipping Speech-Language Clinicians for the Critical Appraisal of an Artificial Intelligence–Driven, Evidence-Based Future (2025) · cites this paper as Furlong et al., 2017
The overall methodological quality of research is moderate to low for computerized speech and language interventions, including for systems targeting adults and children with normal and atypical hearing.
“The overall methodological quality of research is moderate to low for computerized speech and language interventions, including for systems targeting adults and children with normal and atypical hearing (Y.-P.P. Chen et al., 2016;Furlong et al., 2017;Simpson et al., 2015).”
From Equipping Speech-Language Clinicians for the Critical Appraisal of an Artificial Intelligence–Driven, Evidence-Based Future (2025) · cites this paper as Furlong et al., 2017
Furlong et al. (2017) identified factors associated with improvement of speech accuracy with digital intervention, such as being younger (4-5-year-olds as compared to 6-7-year-olds), being female, being stimulable for target sounds and exhibiting accurate phoneme perception before intervention.
“In terms of participant profiles, Furlong et al. (2017) identified factors associated with improvement of speech accuracy with digital intervention, such as being younger (4–5‐year‐olds as compared to 6–7‐year‐olds), being female, being stimulable for target sounds and exhibiting accurate phoneme perception before intervention.”
From Self‐Supervised App‐Based Speech Training for Children With Speech Sound Disorder—A Single‐Case Experimental Design Study (2026) · cites this paper as Furlong et al. 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Furlong, L., Erickson, S., & Morris, M. E.
- Affiliations
- La Trobe University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Furlong, Lisa
- Venue
- Journal of Communication Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 68
- Pages
- 50-69
- ISSN
- 0021-9924 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2624866404
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Communication Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- access to services, clinical outcomes, augmentative and alternative communication
- MeSH terms
- Child, Humans, Software, Speech-Language Pathology, Speech Therapy, Speech Sound Disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review