Cited by 101Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

In vivo anti-tumor effect of PEG liposomal doxorubicin (DOX) in DOX-resistant tumor-bearing mice: Involvement of cytotoxic effect on vascular endothelial cells

Ogawara, Ken-ichi, Un, Keita, Tanaka, Ken-ichi, Higaki, Kazutaka, Kimura, Toshikiro·2009·Journal of Controlled Release

Abstract

We evaluated the in vivo anti-tumor effect of polyethylene glycol-modified liposomal doxorubicin (PEG liposomal DOX) in the DOX-resistant Colon-26 cancer cells (C26/DOX)-bearing mice model. IC(50) value of DOX to C26/DOX in vitro (40.0 microM) was about 250 times higher than that to control C26 (C26/control) (0.15 microM). However, in vivo anti-tumor effect of PEG liposomal DOX was similar in both C26/control- and C26/DOX-bearing mice, suggesting that the in vivo anti-tumor effect of PEG liposomal DOX was not directly reflecting the sensitivity of these tumor cells to DOX. IC(50) value (0.10 microM) of DOX to HUVEC, a model vascular endothelial cell, was similar to that of C26/control. Double immunohistochemical staining of vascular endothelial cells and apoptotic cells within the tumor tissue after intravenous administration of PEG liposomal DOX showed that the extent of co-localization of apoptotic cells with endothelial cells was significantly higher for C26/DOX tumors (60%) than C26/control ones (20%), suggesting that the apoptosis is caused preferentially for vascular endothelial cells in C26/DOX tumor. From these results, it was suggested that the cytotoxic effect of DOX on vascular endothelial cells in the tumor would be involved in the in vivo anti-tumor effect of PEG liposomal DOX in C26/DOX-bearing mice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.09.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 101

Authors
Ogawara, K.-I., Un, K., Tanaka, K.-I., Higaki, K., & Kimura, T.
Affiliations
  • Okayama University (JP)
  • Shujitsu University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kimura, Toshikiro
Venue
Journal of Controlled Release
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
133
Issue
1
Pages
4-10
ISSN
0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985149245
Cited by
101
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Controlled Release (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
doxorubicin resistance, vascular endothelial cells, tumor vasculature, apoptosis, anti-tumor effect, colon cancer, human umbilical vein endothelial cells, drug resistance reversal, tumor-bearing mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibiotics, Antineoplastic, Cell Line, Cell Survival, Doxorubicin, Drug Interactions, Humans, Liposomes, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Neoplasms, Polyethylene Glycols, Verapamil, Survival Analysis, Apoptosis, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Inhibitory Concentration 50, ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1, Endothelial Cells, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review