The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantification of plasmid DNA copies in the nucleus after lipoplex and polyplex transfection
Open accessAbstract
Nuclear uptake of plasmid DNA is one of the many cellular barriers that limit the efficiency of non-viral gene delivery systems. We have determined the number of plasmids that reach the nucleus of a transfected cell using an internally standardized quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay. We isolated nuclei using two different protocols: a density gradient technique and a detergent-based method. The density gradient procedure yielded nuclei with substantially less adhering plasmids on the outside of the nuclei. Using the density gradient protocol we determined that cells transfected with Lipofectamine™ lipoplexes or polyethylenimine polyplexes contained between 75 and 50,000 plasmids/nucleus, depending on the applied plasmid dose. Any increase above 3000 plasmids/nucleus resulted in only marginal increases in transgene expression. Furthermore, lipoplex-delivered plasmids were more efficiently expressed, on the basis of protein expression per plasmid number in the nucleus, than polyplex-delivered plasmids. This indicates that polymer may remain bound to some plasmids in the nucleus. Lastly, by sorting transfected cells into high- and low-expressing sub-populations, we observe that a sub-population of cells contain 3x greater plasmids/nucleus but express nearly 100x more transgene than other cells within a single transfection reaction. Taken together these results suggest the importance of considering the processes downstream from nuclear entry for strategies to improve the efficiency of gene transfer reagents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tseng, W.-C., Haselton, F. R., & Giorgio, T. D. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.41.25641 · Cited by 182
Cited by
Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy
Yin, H., Kanasty, R. L., Eltoukhy, A. A., Vegas, A. J., Dorkin, J. R., & Anderson, D. G. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3763 · Cited by 3,123
Recent Advances in Subcellular Targeted Cancer Therapy Based on Functional Materials
Chen, W., Luo, G., & Zhang, X. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201802725 · Cited by 373
Polymeric Delivery of Therapeutic Nucleic Acids
Kumar, R., Santa Chalarca, C. F., Bockman, M. R., Bruggen, C. V., Grimme, C. J., Dalal, R. J., Hanson, M. G., Hexum, J. K., & Reineke, T. M. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00997 · Cited by 365
Nucleic Acid Delivery: The Missing Pieces of the Puzzle?
Nguyen, J., & Szoka, F. C. (2012) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar3000162 · Cited by 347
Self-citationReissmann, S. (2014) · Journal of Peptide Science · doi:10.1002/psc.2672 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, R. N., van der Aa, M. A. E. M., Macaraeg, N., Lee, A. P., & Szoka, F. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Controlled Release
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 166-174
- ISSN
- 0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007831086
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of plasmid DNA copies in the nucleus after lipoplex and polyplex transfection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.12.016
- The paper
- Cohen, R. N., van der Aa, M. A. E. M., Macaraeg, N., Lee, A. P., & Szoka, F. C. (2009). Quantification of plasmid DNA copies in the nucleus after lipoplex and polyplex transfection. Journal of Controlled Release. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.12.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.