Controlled pulmonary drug and gene delivery using polymeric nano-carriers
Abstract
Pulmonary drug and gene delivery to the lung represents a non-invasive avenue for local and systemic therapies. However, the respiratory tract provides substantial barriers that need to be overcome for successful pulmonary application. In this regard, micro- and nano-sized particles offer novel concepts for the development of optimized therapeutic tools in pulmonary research. Polymeric nano-carriers are generally preferred as controlled pulmonary delivery systems due to prolonged retention in the lung. Specific manipulation of nano-carrier characteristics enables the design of "intelligent" carriers specific for modulation of the duration and intensity of pharmacological effects. New formulations should be tested for pulmonary absorption and distribution using more advanced ex vivo and in vivo models. The delivery of nano-carriers to the air-space enables a detailed characterization of the interaction between the carrier vehicle and the natural pulmonary environment. In summary, polymeric nanoparticles seem to be especially promising as controlled delivery systems and represent a solid basis for future advancement for pulmonary delivery applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Functionalization of polymeric particles allows conjugation of ligands, DNA, peptides, and carbohydrates for targeted delivery.
“Functionalization of these particles allows the chemical conjugation of various ligands, DNA, peptides, and carbohydrates for the efficient targeted delivery of the particles.165”
From Targeted therapy in chronic diseases using nanomaterial-based drug delivery vehicles (2019) · cites this paper as [165]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 142 · Cited by 200
- Authors
- Beck-Broichsitter, M., Merkel, O. M., & Kissel, T.
- Affiliations
- Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kissel, Thomas
- ORCID
- Merkel, Olivia M.
- Venue
- Journal of Controlled Release
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 214-224
- ISSN
- 0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023306783
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 142
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Controlled Release (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Keywords
- pulmonary drug delivery, pulmonary gene delivery, polymeric nanoparticles, nanocarriers, controlled release, lung retention, pulmonary absorption, pulmonary distribution
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Drug Carriers, Humans, Lung, Lung Diseases, Polymers, Gene Transfer Techniques, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review