Persistence of non-viral vector mediated RPE65 expression: Case for viability as a gene transfer therapy for RPE-based diseases
Open accessAbstract
Mutations in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) gene RPE65 are associated with multiple blinding diseases including Leber's Congenital Amaurosis (LCA). Our goal has been to develop persistent, effective non-viral genetic therapies to treat this condition. Using precisely engineered DNA vectors and high capacity compacted DNA nanoparticles (NP), we previously demonstrated that both plasmid and NP forms of VMD2-hRPE65-S/MAR improved the disease phenotypes in an rpe65(-/-) model of LCA up to 6 months post-injection (PI), however the duration of this treatment efficacy was not established. Here, we test the ability of these vectors to sustain gene expression and phenotypic improvement for the life of the animal. NPs or naked DNA were subretinally injected in rpe65(-/-) mice at postnatal day (P) 16 and evaluated at 15 months PI. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunofluorescence were performed at PI-15 months and demonstrated appreciable expression of transferred RPE65 (levels were 32% of wild-type [WT] for NPs and 44% of WT for naked DNA). No reduction in expression at the message level was observed from PI-6 month data. Spectral electroretinography (ERG) demonstrated significant improvement in cone ERG amplitudes in treated versus uninjected animals. Most importantly, we also observed reduced fundus autofluorescence in the eyes injected with NP and naked DNA compared to uninjected counterparts. Consistent with these observations, biochemical studies showed a reduction in the accumulation of toxic retinyl esters in treated mice, suggesting that the transferred hRPE65 was functional. These critical results indicate that both NP and uncompacted plasmid VMD2-hRPE65-S/MAR can mediate persistent, long-term improvement in an RPE-associated disease phenotype, and suggest that DNA NPs, which are non-toxic and have a large payload capacity, expand the treatment repertoire available for ocular gene therapy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rod-shaped CK30-PEG-compacted nanoparticles effectively transfected both RPE and photoreceptors and showed efficacious gene therapy of Rpe65−/− and Abca4−/− mice.
“Outstanding studies from Naash and colleagues showed that rod-shaped CK30-PEG (polyethylene glycol)-compacted NPs effectively transfected both RPE and photoreceptors and showed efficacious gene therapy of Rpe65−/− (retinal pigment epithelium 65; model of LCA) and Abca4−/− (Stargardt Disease) mice [39,40,41].”
From The Ocular Gene Delivery Landscape (2021) · cites this paper as [40]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 47
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [17]Cai X Conley SM Nash Z Fliesler SJ Cooper MJ Naash MI Gene delivery to mitotic and postmitotic photoreceptors via compacted DNA nanoparticles results in improved phenotype in a mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa FASEB J 2010 24 1178 1191 19952284 PMC2845431
- [24]Koirala A Makkia RS Conley SM Cooper MJ Naash MI S/MAR-containing DNA nanoparticles promote persistent RPE gene expression and improvement in RPE65-associated LCA Hum. Mol. Genet 2013 In Press PMC3605833 23335596
- [36]Znoiko SL Rohrer B Lu K Lohr HR Crouch RK Ma JX Downregulation of cone-specific gene expression and degeneration of cone photoreceptors in the Rpe65−/− mouse at early ages Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci 2005 46 1473 1479 15790918
- Authors
- Koirala, A., Conley, S. M., Makkia, R., Liu, Z., Cooper, M. J., Sparrow, J. R., & Naash, M. I.
- Affiliations
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
- Copernicus Therapeutics (United States) (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Naash, Muna I.
- Venue
- Journal of Controlled Release
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 172
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 745-752
- ISSN
- 0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3858392
- OpenAlex
- W1983899989
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Controlled Release (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (EY018656-MIN, EY22778-MIN, EY018512-SMC, EY012951-JRS)
- Foundation Fighting Blindness
- Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology
- State of Ohio Biomedical Research Commercialization Program
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Keywords
- RPE65, Leber congenital amaurosis, non-viral gene therapy, DNA nanoparticles, retinal pigment epithelium, subretinal injection, fundus autofluorescence, ocular gene therapy
- MeSH terms
- Retinoid Isomerohydrolase, Animals, DNA, Humans, Genetic Therapy, Gene Expression, Gene Deletion, Gene Transfer Techniques, cis-trans-Isomerases, Mice, Retinal Pigment Epithelium
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review