Cited by 3813D Printing in Biomedical ResearchMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Organ-on-a-chip platforms for studying drug delivery systems

Open access
Bhise, Nupura S., Ribas, João, Manoharan, Vijayan, Zhang, Yu Shrike, Polini, Alessandro, Massa, Solange, Dokmeci, Mehmet R., Khademhosseini, Ali·2014·Journal of Controlled Release

Abstract

Novel microfluidic tools allow new ways to manufacture and test drug delivery systems. Organ-on-a-chip systems - microscale recapitulations of complex organ functions - promise to improve the drug development pipeline. This review highlights the importance of integrating microfluidic networks with 3D tissue engineered models to create organ-on-a-chip platforms, able to meet the demand of creating robust preclinical screening models. Specific examples are cited to demonstrate the use of these systems for studying the performance of drug delivery vectors and thereby reduce the discrepancies between their performance at preclinical and clinical trials. We also highlight the future directions that need to be pursued by the research community for these proof-of-concept studies to achieve the goal of accelerating clinical translation of drug delivery nanoparticles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.05.004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 153 · Cited by 381

Authors
Bhise, N. S., Ribas, J., Manoharan, V., Zhang, Y. S., Polini, A., Massa, S., Dokmeci, M. R., & Khademhosseini, A.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Khademhosseini, Ali
Venue
Journal of Controlled Release
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
190
Pages
82-93
ISSN
0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032088674
Cited by
381
References
153
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Controlled Release (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Office of Naval Research Young National Investigator Award
  • National Institutes of Health (HL092836, DE019024, EB012597, AR057837, DE021468, HL099073, EB008392))
  • Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers
  • Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (SFRH/BD/51679/2011).)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
organ-on-a-chip, microfluidics, drug delivery systems, 3D tissue engineering, drug delivery vectors, nanoparticle drug delivery, translational research, drug development
MeSH terms
Drug Carriers, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Drug Delivery Systems, Biomimetic Materials, Microfluidics, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques, Nanoparticles, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review