Cited by 21Ultrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics

Tumor microenvironment determines response to a heat-activated thermosensitive liposome formulation of cisplatin in cervical carcinoma

Dou, Yannan N., Chaudary, Naz, Chang, Martin C., Dunne, Michael, Huang, Huang, Jaffray, David A., Milosevic, Michael, Allen, Christine·2017·Journal of Controlled Release

Abstract

Significant heterogeneity in the tumor microenvironment of human cervical cancer patients is known to challenge treatment outcomes in this population. The current standard of care for cervical cancer patients is radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy. Yet this treatment strategy fails to control loco-regional disease in 10-30% of patients. In order to improve the loco-regional control rate, a thermosensitive liposome formulation of CDDP (HTLC) was developed to increase local concentrations of drug in response to mild hyperthermia (HT). The HTLC formulation in combination with local HT demonstrated a significant therapeutic advantage in comparison to free drug and Lipoplatin™ in ME-180 and SiHa xenograft models of human cervical cancer, as well as in four distinct cervical patient-derived xenograft models. Differential response to HTLC+HT treatment was observed between the ME-180 and SiHa tumor models. Tumor doubling time, in vitro cell sensitivity, and tumor drug accumulation were found to be non-predictive of treatment efficacy. Rather, tumor microenvironment parameters, in particular elevated levels of both tumor hypoxia and associated stromal content, were found to serve as the overriding factors that limit drug efficacy. The prognostic value of these markers may enable stratification of cervical cancer patients for implementation of personalized medicine in the clinical setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.07.039

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in composition of the tumor microenvironment may lead to intertumoral heterogeneity in nanodrug aggregation and therapy outcome.

    “The differences in the composition of TME may lead to intertumoral heterogeneity in nanodrug aggregation and therapy outcome [124].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 21

Authors
Dou, Y. N., Chaudary, N., Chang, M. C., Dunne, M., Huang, H., Jaffray, D. A., Milosevic, M., & Allen, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Allen, Christine
Venue
Journal of Controlled Release
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
262
Pages
182-191
ISSN
0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2740354459
Cited by
21
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Controlled Release (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Keywords
cervical cancer, tumor microenvironment, thermosensitive liposomes, cisplatin, hyperthermia, tumor hypoxia, patient-derived xenografts, SiHa, drug accumulation, treatment response heterogeneity, prognostic factors, personalized medicine
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Cell Survival, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cisplatin, Female, Hot Temperature, Humans, Liposomes, Mice, SCID, Cell Line, Tumor, Tumor Burden, Tumor Microenvironment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review