Tumor microenvironment determines response to a heat-activated thermosensitive liposome formulation of cisplatin in cervical carcinoma
Abstract
Significant heterogeneity in the tumor microenvironment of human cervical cancer patients is known to challenge treatment outcomes in this population. The current standard of care for cervical cancer patients is radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy. Yet this treatment strategy fails to control loco-regional disease in 10-30% of patients. In order to improve the loco-regional control rate, a thermosensitive liposome formulation of CDDP (HTLC) was developed to increase local concentrations of drug in response to mild hyperthermia (HT). The HTLC formulation in combination with local HT demonstrated a significant therapeutic advantage in comparison to free drug and Lipoplatin™ in ME-180 and SiHa xenograft models of human cervical cancer, as well as in four distinct cervical patient-derived xenograft models. Differential response to HTLC+HT treatment was observed between the ME-180 and SiHa tumor models. Tumor doubling time, in vitro cell sensitivity, and tumor drug accumulation were found to be non-predictive of treatment efficacy. Rather, tumor microenvironment parameters, in particular elevated levels of both tumor hypoxia and associated stromal content, were found to serve as the overriding factors that limit drug efficacy. The prognostic value of these markers may enable stratification of cervical cancer patients for implementation of personalized medicine in the clinical setting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Differences in composition of the tumor microenvironment may lead to intertumoral heterogeneity in nanodrug aggregation and therapy outcome.
“The differences in the composition of TME may lead to intertumoral heterogeneity in nanodrug aggregation and therapy outcome [124].”
From Approaches to Improve EPR-Based Drug Delivery for Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis (2023) · cites this paper as [124]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Dou, Y. N., Chaudary, N., Chang, M. C., Dunne, M., Huang, H., Jaffray, D. A., Milosevic, M., & Allen, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- University Health Network (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Allen, Christine
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Controlled Release
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 262
- Pages
- 182-191
- ISSN
- 0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2740354459
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Controlled Release (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
- Keywords
- cervical cancer, tumor microenvironment, thermosensitive liposomes, cisplatin, hyperthermia, tumor hypoxia, patient-derived xenografts, SiHa, drug accumulation, treatment response heterogeneity, prognostic factors, personalized medicine
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Cell Survival, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cisplatin, Female, Hot Temperature, Humans, Liposomes, Mice, SCID, Cell Line, Tumor, Tumor Burden, Tumor Microenvironment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review