Lipid nanoparticles for delivery of messenger RNA to the back of the eye
Open accessAbstract
Retinal gene therapy has had unprecedented success in generating treatments that can halt vision loss. However, immunogenic response and long-term toxicity with the use of viral vectors remain a concern. Non-viral vectors are relatively non-immunogenic, scalable platforms that have had limited success with DNA delivery to the eye. Messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics has expanded the ability to achieve high gene expression while eliminating unintended genomic integration or the need to cross the restrictive nuclear barrier. Lipid-based nanoparticles (LNPs) remain at the forefront of potent delivery vectors for nucleic acids. Herein, we tested eleven different LNP variants for their ability to deliver mRNA to the back of the eye. LNPs that contained ionizable lipids with low pKa and unsaturated hydrocarbon chains showed the highest amount of reporter gene transfection in the retina. The kinetics of gene expression showed a rapid onset (within 4 h) that persisted for 96 h. The gene delivery was cell-type specific with majority of the expression in the retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) and limited expression in the Müller glia. LNP-delivered mRNA can be used to treat monogenic retinal degenerative disorders of the RPE. The transient nature of mRNA-based therapeutics makes it desirable for applications that are directed towards retinal reprogramming or genome editing. Overall, non-viral delivery of RNA therapeutics to diverse cell types within the retina can provide transformative new approaches to prevent blindness.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lipid-based transfection systems have shown success in transferring target genes into retinal cells in several studies, and multiple lipid-based drugs for eye diseases are already available in the clinic and for delivery of CRISPR or ribonucleoproteins for base editing.
“Similarly, lipid-based transfection systems have shown success in their ability to transfer the target genes into retinal cells in several studies, and multiple lipid-based drugs for eye diseases are already available in the clinic35,79,87–91 and for the delivery of CRISPR or ribonucleoproteins for base editing.92,93”
From Gene Therapy for Retinal Degenerative Diseases: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions (2023) · cites this paper as [79]
Chemical methods of non-viral gene delivery are appealing for their reduced immunogenicity, ease of scaling, reduced expenses for production, and increased payload size.
“Chemical methods of non-viral gene delivery are appealing for their reduced immunogenicity, ease of scaling, reduced expenses for production, and increased payload size.79”
From Gene Therapy for Retinal Degenerative Diseases: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions (2023) · cites this paper as [79]
After subretinal injection of MC3-based mRNA LNPs in albino BALB/c mice, photoreceptor expression persisted for 96 h (began within 4 h and peaked at 24 h) and mainly distributed in the retinal pigmented epithelium.
“After a subretinal injection, the photoreceptor expression persisted for 96 h (began within 4 h and reached peak expression at 24 h), and mainly distributed in the retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE).[132]”
From RNA delivery biomaterials for the treatment of genetic and rare diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [132]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 260
- Authors
- Patel, S., Ryals, R. C., Weller, K. K., Pennesi, M. E., & Sahay, G.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sahay, Gaurav
- Venue
- Journal of Controlled Release
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 303
- Pages
- 91-100
- ISSN
- 0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6579630
- OpenAlex
- W2936556314
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 6.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Controlled Release (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Foundation
- OSU Startup funds
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
- Research to Prevent Blindness (1R15EB021581-01)
- National Institutes of Health (P30 EY010572)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- lipid nanoparticles, mRNA delivery, retinal gene therapy, ionizable lipids, retinal pigment epithelium, Müller cells, non-viral vectors, cell type-specific gene expression, transient expression, vision loss
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Eye, Female, Lipids, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, RNA, Messenger, Gene Transfer Techniques, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review