Cited by 100Bone Tissue Engineering Materialsbiodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Performance comparison of PLA- and PLGA-coated porous bioceramic scaffolds: Mechanical, biodegradability, bioactivity, delivery and biocompatibility assessments

Open access
Maadani, Amir Mohammad, Salahinejad, Erfan·2022·Journal of Controlled Release

Abstract

Bioceramics, particularly calcium phosphates, bioactive glasses, and crystalline silicates, are a principal group of biomaterials employed for the regeneration of damaged tissues and therapeutic delivery. The development of ceramic tissue engineering scaffolds with an appropriate combination of mechanical and biological properties is still one of the key challenges in this field. In this regard, the deposition of polymeric coatings on the scaffolds is a simple and effective approach to reinforce their functions. Among different polymers, the influences of biodegradable aliphatic polyester coatings, especially polylactic acid (PLA) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), over the performance of the scaffolds have been investigated in numerous research. This review paper provides a comprehensive comparison of PLA- and PLGA-coated bioceramic scaffolds which are mainly employed in bone tissue engineering. It is concluded that both the polymers enhance the mechanical behaviors of the scaffolds, but control their biodegradability, bioactivity, and delivery kinetics, where PLA acts almost more influentially than PLGA in comparison. However, the response of biocompatibility to this surface treatment is condition-dependent and requires case-by-case experiments to be determined accurately.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.09.022

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With varying distributions of the isomers in the structure, PLA can be produced in a variety of molecular weights between several thousand and several million.

    “With varying distributions of the isomers in the structure, PLA can be produced in a variety of molecular weights between several thousand and several million [81].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maadani, A. M., & Salahinejad, E.
Affiliations
K. N. Toosi University of Technology (IR)
Corresponding author
Salahinejad, Erfan
Venue
Journal of Controlled Release
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
351
Pages
1-7
ISSN
0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4296248532
Cited by
100
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Controlled Release (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
polylactic acid coating, bioceramic scaffolds, porous scaffolds, calcium phosphate, bioactive glass, bone tissue engineering, biodegradability, bioactivity (biomaterials), mechanical properties, biocompatibility, surface modification
MeSH terms
Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer, Polyesters, Polyglycolic Acid, Porosity, Lactic Acid, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review