The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CO2 capture from dry flue gas by means of VPSA, TSA and TVSA
Abstract
Abstract A systematic study of adsorption processes at lab-scale for CO2 capture from dry flue gas was presented to attain the specification of CCS (95% CO2 purity, 90% CO2 recovery) in this work. With zeolite 13X as adsorbent, two-stage vacuum swing adsorption (VPSA), temperature swing adsorption (TSA), and temperature/vacuum swing adsorption (TVSA) were designed, simulated, and systematically compared at lab-scale. Furthermore, key operating parameters including feed flowrate, purge to feed ratio, vacuum level, time of recycle step were investigated to obtain the optimized process performance. The results showed that CO2 products of all three processes could reach the specification of CCS. VPSA was capable to achieve a great advantage in productivity and energy consumption with the value of 3.8 molCO2/kgads/h and 0.79 MJ/kgCO2 respectively, and it seemed to be the most effective CO2 capture process compared with TSA and TVSA. TVSA performed best in CO2 purity and recovery with the value of 97.27% and 97.66% respectively, meanwhile the productivity was up to 1.63 mol/kgads/h with the energy consumption of 3.22 MJ/kgCO2. Moreover, it is worth noting that TVSA would be an energy saving adsorption process that can produce CO2 product with high CO2 purity and CO2 recovery if a suitable low-grade waste heat source was available. Nevertheless, TSA was suggested to be an inefficient way for CO2 capture due to its poor performance of productivity and energy consumption, as well as no advantage in terms of CO2 purity and recovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two-Stage VPSA Process for CO2 Capture from Flue Gas Using Activated Carbon Beads
Shen, C., Liu, Z., Li, P., & Yu, J. (2012) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie202097y · Cited by 138
Effects of water vapour on CO2 capture with vacuum swing adsorption using activated carbon
Xu, D., Xiao, P., Zhang, J., Li, G., Xiao, G., Webley, P. A., & Zhai, Y. (2013) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2013.06.080 · Cited by 112
Self-citation
Cited by
Adsorption of Carbon Dioxide for post-combustion capture: a review
Raganati, F., Miccio, F., & Ammendola, P. (2021) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01618 · Cited by 661
Hong, W. Y. (2022) · Carbon Capture Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100044 · Cited by 455
Porous organic polymers for CO2capture, separation and conversion
Song, K. S., Fritz, P. W., & Coskun, A. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d2cs00727d · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, N., Shen, Y., Liu, B., Zhang, D., Tang, Z., Li, G., & Fu, B.
- Venue
- Journal of CO2 Utilization
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 35
- Pages
- 153-168
- ISSN
- 2212-9820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2978521883
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CO2 capture from dry flue gas by means of VPSA, TSA and TVSA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcou.2019.09.012
- The paper
- Jiang, N., Shen, Y., Liu, B., Zhang, D., Tang, Z., Li, G., & Fu, B. (2020). CO2 capture from dry flue gas by means of VPSA, TSA and TVSA. Journal of CO2 Utilization. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2019.09.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.