The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine learning of linear differential equations using Gaussian processes
Open accessAbstract
This work leverages recent advances in probabilistic machine learning to discover governing equations expressed by parametric linear operators. Such equations involve, but are not limited to, ordinary and partial differential, integro-differential, and fractional order operators. Here, Gaussian process priors are modified according to the particular form of such operators and are employed to infer parameters of the linear equations from scarce and possibly noisy observations. Such observations may come from experiments or black-box computer simulations, as demonstrated in several synthetic examples and a realistic application in functional genomics. Employ probabilistic machine learning to discover governing equations expressed by parametric linear operators.Proper placement of Gaussian process priors allows one to efficiently infer model parameters via maximum likelihood estimation.A general treatment of inverse problems governed by linear operators, leading to model discovery from just a handful of noisy measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Reverse Engineering the Gap Gene Network of Drosophila melanogaster
Perkins, T. J., Jaeger, J., Reinitz, J., & Glass, L. (2006) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020051 · Cited by 187
Cited by
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 · Cited by 20,384
Self-citationPhysics-informed machine learning
Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 · Cited by 8,718
Self-citationPhysics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: a review
Cai, S., Mao, Z., Wang, Z., Yin, M., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2021) · Acta Mechanica Sinica · doi:10.1007/s10409-021-01148-1 · Cited by 2,084
Self-citationJagtap, A. D., Kharazmi, E., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2020) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2020.113028 · Cited by 1,208
Self-citationfPINNs: Fractional Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Pang, G., Lu, L., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/18m1229845 · Cited by 1,105
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 348
- Pages
- 683-693
- ISSN
- 0021-9991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2573864470
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 20.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning of linear differential equations using Gaussian processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.07.050
- The paper
- Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2017). Machine learning of linear differential equations using Gaussian processes. Journal of Computational Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.07.050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.