The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep UQ: Learning deep neural network surrogate models for high dimensional uncertainty quantification
Open accessAbstract
Abstract State-of-the-art computer codes for simulating real physical systems are often characterized by vast number of input parameters. Performing uncertainty quantification (UQ) tasks with Monte Carlo (MC) methods is almost always infeasible because of the need to perform hundreds of thousands or even millions of forward model evaluations in order to obtain convergent statistics. One, thus, tries to construct a cheap-to-evaluate surrogate model to replace the forward model solver. For systems with large numbers of input parameters, one has to address the curse of dimensionality through suitable dimensionality reduction techniques. A popular class of dimensionality reduction methods are those that attempt to recover a low-dimensional representation of the high-dimensional feature space. However, such methods often tend to overestimate the intrinsic dimensionality of the input feature space. In this work, we demonstrate the use of deep neural networks (DNN) to construct surrogate models for numerical simulators. We parameterize the structure of the DNN in a manner that lends the DNN surrogate the interpretation of recovering a low-dimensional nonlinear manifold. The model response is a parameterized nonlinear function of the low-dimensional projections of the input. We think of this low-dimensional manifold as a nonlinear generalization of the notion of the active subspace. Our approach is demonstrated with a problem on uncertainty propagation in a stochastic elliptic partial differential equation (SPDE) with uncertain diffusion coefficient. We deviate from traditional formulations of the SPDE problem by lifting the assumption of fixed lengthscales of the uncertain diffusion field. Instead we attempt to solve a more challenging problem of learning a map between an arbitrary snapshot of the diffusion field and the response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 · Cited by 21,728
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04467 · Cited by 9,408
ADADELTA: An Adaptive Learning Rate Method
Zeiler, M. D. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1212.5701 · Cited by 5,322
Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)
Clevert, D.-A., Unterthiner, T., & Hochreiter, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.07289 · Cited by 4,513
Practical Recommendations for Gradient-Based Training of Deep Architectures
Bengio, Y. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_26 · Cited by 2,259
Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade: Second Edition
(2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8 · Cited by 2,116
Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networks
Blundell, C., Cornebise, J., Kavukcuoglu, K., & Wierstra, D. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1505.05424 · Cited by 1,342
Zhu, Y., & Zabaras, N. (2018) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.04.018 · Cited by 704
Cited by
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 · Cited by 20,384
Physics-informed machine learning
Karniadakis, G. E., Kevrekidis, I. G., Lu, L., Perdikaris, P., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 · Cited by 8,718
Numerical Solution of the Parametric Diffusion Equation by Deep Neural Networks
Geist, M., Petersen, P., Raslan, M., Schneider, R., & Kutyniok, G. (2021) · Journal of Scientific Computing · doi:10.1007/s10915-021-01532-w · Cited by 57
Basic Framework and Main Methods of Uncertainty Quantification
Zhang, J., Yin, J., & Wang, R. (2020) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2020/6068203 · Cited by 52
Gao, H., Zhu, X., & Wang, J.-X. (2020) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2020.113047 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Tripathy, R. K., & Bilionis, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 375
- Pages
- 565-588
- ISSN
- 0021-9991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2786232134
- Cited by
- 464
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 19.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep UQ: Learning deep neural network surrogate models for high dimensional uncertainty quantification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.08.036
- The paper
- Tripathy, R. K., & Bilionis, I. (2018). Deep UQ: Learning deep neural network surrogate models for high dimensional uncertainty quantification. Journal of Computational Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.08.036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.