The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A-PINN: Auxiliary physics informed neural networks for forward and inverse problems of nonlinear integro-differential equations
Open accessAbstract
Physics informed neural networks (PINNs) are a novel deep learning paradigm primed for solving forward and inverse problems of nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs). By embedding physical information delineated by PDEs in feedforward neural networks, PINNs are trained as surrogate models for approximate solution to the PDEs without need of label data. Due to the excellent capability of neural networks in describing complex relationships, a variety of PINN-based methods have bene developed to solve different kinds of problems such as integer-order PDEs, fractional PDEs, stochastic PDEs and integro-differential equations (IDEs). However, for the state-of-the-art PINN methods in application to IDEs, integral discretization is a key prerequisite in order that IDEs can be transformed into ordinary differential equations (ODEs). However, integral discretization inevitably introduces discretization error and truncation error to the solution. In this study, we propose an auxiliary physics informed neural network (A-PINN) framework for solving forward and inverse problems of nonlinear IDEs. By defining auxiliary output variable(s) to represent the integral(s) in the governing equation and employing automatic differentiation of the auxiliary output to replace integral operator, the proposed A-PINN bypasses the limitation of integral discretization. Distinct from the neural network in the original PINN which only approximates the variables in the governing equation, in the proposed A-PINN framework, a multi-output neural network is constructed to simultaneously calculate the primary outputs and auxiliary outputs which respectively approximate the variables and integrals in the governing equation. Subsequently, the relationship between the primary outputs and auxiliary outputs is constrained by new output conditions in compliance with physical laws. By pursuing the first-order nonlinear Volterra IDE benchmark problem, we validate that the proposed A-PINN can obtain more accurate solution than the conventional PINN. We further demonstrate the good performance of A-PINN in solving the forward problems involving nonlinear Volterra IDE systems, nonlinear 2-dimensional Volterra IDE, and nonlinear Fredholm IDE. Finally, the A-PINN framework is implemented to solve the inverse problem of nonlinear IDEs and the results show that the unknown parameters can be satisfactorily discovered even with heavily noisy data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.01703 · Cited by 31,473
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 · Cited by 20,384
DeepXDE: A Deep Learning Library for Solving Differential Equations
Lu, L., Meng, X., Mao, Z., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2021) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/19m1274067 · Cited by 2,512
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: a review
Cai, S., Mao, Z., Wang, Z., Yin, M., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2021) · Acta Mechanica Sinica · doi:10.1007/s10409-021-01148-1 · Cited by 2,084
Understanding and Mitigating Gradient Flow Pathologies in Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Wang, S., Teng, Y., & Perdikaris, P. (2021) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/20m1318043 · Cited by 2,048
Automatic Differentiation in Machine Learning: a Survey
Baydin, A. G., Pearlmutter, B. A., Radul, A., & Siskind, J. M. (2015) · Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University) · Cited by 2,014
When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective
Wang, S., Yu, X., & Perdikaris, P. (2022) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110768 · Cited by 1,496
Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Heat Transfer Problems
Cai, S., Wang, Z., Wang, S., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2021) · Journal of Heat Transfer · doi:10.1115/1.4050542 · Cited by 1,312
A physics-informed deep learning framework for inversion and surrogate modeling in solid mechanics
Haghighat, E., Raissi, M., Moure, A., Gomez, H., & Juanes, R. (2021) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2021.113741 · Cited by 1,305
Physics-informed neural networks for high-speed flows
Mao, Z., Jagtap, A. D., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2020) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2019.112789 · Cited by 1,282
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuan, L., Ni, Y.-Q., Deng, X.-Y., & Hao, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-08
- Volume
- 462
- Pages
- 111260
- ISSN
- 0021-9991 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4225995462
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 28.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A-PINN: Auxiliary physics informed neural networks for forward and inverse problems of nonlinear integro-differential equations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111260
- The paper
- Yuan, L., Ni, Y.-Q., Deng, X.-Y., & Hao, S. (2022). A-PINN: Auxiliary physics informed neural networks for forward and inverse problems of nonlinear integro-differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.