Cited by 55Ultrasound in Clinical ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationUltrasound Imaging and Elastography

Tele-intensivists can instruct non-physicians to acquire high-quality ultrasound images

Levine, Andrea R., McCurdy, Michael T., Zubrow, Marc T., Papali, Alfred, Mallemat, Haney A., Verceles, Avelino C.·2015·Journal of Critical Care

Abstract

Purpose Intensive care unit telemedicine (tele-ICU) uses audiovisual systems to remotely monitor and manage patients. Intensive care unit ultrasound can augment an otherwise limited bedside evaluation. To date, no studies have utilized tele-ICU technology to assess the quality and clinical use of real-time ultrasound images. We assessed whether tele-intensivists can instruct nonphysicians to obtain high-quality, clinically useful ultrasound images.Methods This prospective pilot evaluated the effectiveness of a brief educational session of nonphysician "ultrasonographers" on their ability to obtain ultrasound images (right internal jugular vein, bilateral lung apices and bases, cardiac subxiphoid view, bladder) with real-time tele-intensivist guidance. All ultrasound screen images were simultaneously photographed with a 2-way camera and saved on the ultrasound machine. The tele-intensivist assessed image quality, and an independent ultrasound expert rated their use in guiding clinical decisions.Results The intensivist rated the tele-ICU camera images as high quality (70/77, 91%) and suitable for guiding clinical decisions (74/77, 96%). Only bilateral lung apices demonstrated differences in quality and clinical use. All other images were rated noninferior and clinically useful.Conclusion Tele-intensivists can guide minimally trained nonphysicians to obtain high-quality, clinically useful ultrasound images. For most anatomic sites, tele-ICU images are of similar quality to those acquired directly by ultrasound.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.05.030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on research not included in this systematic review, synchronous RTMUS can be successfully performed with <60 min of training.

    “Based on research not included in this systematic review, synchronous RTMUS can be successfully performed with <60 min of training (20, 21, 45, 46).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 55

Authors
Levine, A. R., McCurdy, M. T., Zubrow, M. T., Papali, A., Mallemat, H. A., & Verceles, A. C.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
Levine, Andrea R.
Venue
Journal of Critical Care
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
871-875
ISSN
0883-9441 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1519839588
Cited by
55
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
Keywords
tele-ICU, point-of-care ultrasound, ultrasound image quality, remote guidance, right internal jugular vein, bladder ultrasound, clinical decision support
MeSH terms
Adult, Critical Care, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Teaching, Ultrasonography, Ultrasonics, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review