Sense-making and secondary victimization among unsolved homicide co-victims
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stretesky et al. (2010) report that co-victims of unsolved homicides felt frustration when the justice system limited their access to information about events surrounding the murder of their loved-ones.
“Stretesky et al. (2010) report the frustration felt by co-victims of unsolved homicides when the justice system limited their access to information about events surrounding the murder of their loved-ones.”
From Hidden Risks: Artificial Intelligence and Hermeneutic Harm (2025) · cites this paper as Stretesky et al., 2010
In both cases, the co-victims' ability to make sense of what happened was obstructed.
“In both cases, the co-victims' ability to make sense of what happened was obstructed”
From Hidden Risks: Artificial Intelligence and Hermeneutic Harm (2025) · cites this paper as Stretesky et al., 2010
In both cases, this obstruction plausibly constituted additional harm.
“and in both cases, this obstruction plausibly constituted additional harm.”
From Hidden Risks: Artificial Intelligence and Hermeneutic Harm (2025) · cites this paper as Stretesky et al., 2010
In the first case, the lack of information extended co-victims' bereavement and grieving.
“In the first case, the lack of information extended co-victims' bereavement and grieving (Stretesky et al., 2010, p. 887)”
From Hidden Risks: Artificial Intelligence and Hermeneutic Harm (2025) · cites this paper as Stretesky et al., 2010
A lack of information, or the lack of an adequate explanation, obstructs the possibility of sense-making.
“These are cases where a lack of information, or the lack of an adequate explanation, obstructs the possibility of sense-making.”
From Hidden Risks: Artificial Intelligence and Hermeneutic Harm (2025) · cites this paper as Stretesky et al., 2010
Cites
Meaning in the context of stress and coping
Park, C. L., & Folkman, S. (1997) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.115 · Cited by 1,821 · see citing works
(1995) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.152.1.22 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hidden Risks: Artificial Intelligence and Hermeneutic Harm
Rebera, A. P., Lauwaert, L., & Oimann, A.-K. (2025) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-025-09733-0 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“For example, Stretesky et al. ( 2010 ) report the frustration felt by co-victims of unsolved homicides when the justice system limited their access to information about events surrounding the mur - der of their loved-ones.”
- Authors
- Stretesky, P. B., Shelley, T. O., Hogan, M. J., & Unnithan, N. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
- Colorado State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stretesky, Paul B.
- Venue
- Journal of Criminal Justice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 880-888
- ISSN
- 0047-2352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119746660
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 13.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Criminal Justice (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Keywords
- sensemaking, secondary victimization, unsolved homicide, co-victims, public prosecutor, racial discrimination, identity reconstruction, law enforcement policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
