Assessing the feasibility and performance of risk assessment instruments for early intervention and prevention services in Juvenile Justice
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The argument that the implementation of AI/ML will lead to a substantial improvement in accuracy within the juvenile justice system does not appear to be consistently supported by the currently available evidence.
“Consequently, the argument that the implementation of AI/ML will lead to a substantial improvement in accuracy within the juvenile justice system does not appear to be consistently supported by the currently available evidence (Kigerl et al., 2022;Sheppard et al., 2024).”
From Scoping review on the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning with structured instruments to predict juvenile recidivism (2026) · cites this paper as Sheppard et al., 2024
Virtually identical performance was documented between complex techniques and traditional approaches such as logistic regression, especially when the sample size is large, or the evaluated scenario reduces predictive variability.
“Virtually identical performance was documented between complex techniques and traditional approaches such as logistic regression, especially when the sample size is large, or the evaluated scenario reduces predictive variability (Kigerl et al., 2022;Sheppard et al., 2024).”
From Scoping review on the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning with structured instruments to predict juvenile recidivism (2026) · cites this paper as Sheppard et al., 2024
The variability ranged from no predictive differences (0.74 vs. 0.74 in Sheppard et al., 2024) to moderate improvements (0.75 vs. 0.67 in Mori et al., 2024; 0.73 vs. 0.64 in Miron et al., 2021; and 0.69 vs. 0.64 in Ting et al., 2018).
“This variability ranged from no predictive differences (0.74 vs. 0.74 in Sheppard et al., 2024) to moderate improvements (0.75 vs. 0.67 in Mori et al., 2024;0.73 vs. 0.64 in Miron et al., 2021;and 0.69 vs. 0.64 in Ting et al., 2018).”
From Scoping review on the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning with structured instruments to predict juvenile recidivism (2026) · cites this paper as Sheppard et al., 2024
Sheppard et al. (2024) found similar performance across techniques.
“Similar performa nce across technique s.”
From Scoping review on the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning with structured instruments to predict juvenile recidivism (2026) · cites this paper as Sheppard et al., 2024
The transition from traditional statistical models to complex AI/ML architectures yields only marginal improvements in studies with large samples and preventative approaches.
“The results of studies with large samples (Kigerl et al., 2022) and preventative approaches (Sheppard et al., 2024) demonstrate that the transition from traditional statistical models to complex AI/ML architectures yields only marginal improvements.”
From Scoping review on the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning with structured instruments to predict juvenile recidivism (2026) · cites this paper as Sheppard et al., 2024
Cites
Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r.
Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7 · Cited by 1,608 · see citing works
Racist Algorithms or Systemic Problems? Risk Assessments and Racial Disparities
Vincent, G. M., & Viljoen, J. L. (2020) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854820954501 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Argudo Palacios, A., & Mechraoui, A. (2026) · Cuadernos de RES PUBLICA en derecho y criminología · doi:10.46661/respublica.13244
“Virtually identical performance was documented between complex techniques and traditional approaches such as logistic regression, especially when the sample size is large, or the evaluated scenario reduces predictive variability (Kigerl et al., 2022; Sheppard et al., 2024).”
Influential
- Authors
- Sheppard, K. G., Talaugon, A. R., & Hernandez, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sheppard, Keller G.
- ORCID
- Sheppard, Keller G.
- Venue
- Journal of Criminal Justice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-09
- Volume
- 94
- Pages
- 102262
- ISSN
- 0047-2352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4401756028
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Criminal Justice (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Keywords
- risk assessment tools, juvenile justice, prevention services, early intervention, recidivism prediction, justice-involved youth, predictive validity, machine learning, demographic bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review